Ich kann an der Stelle zumindest teilweise relaten:

Ich war in einer Verteilerliste drin, die einem die Möglichkeit gibt, eine tägliche Zusammenfassung statt lauter einzelner Mails zu erhalten. Aber mein Mail-Client hat dann wohl die Mail für zu lang befunden und nur einen Teil davon angezeigt und den Rest abgeschnitten (vielleicht als Spam-Schutz oder so, keine Ahnung). Man hatte aber auch einen sehr offensichtlichen Button, um sich die komplette Mail anzeigen zu lassen. Vielleicht hat ihr Mail-Client ja etwas ähnliches gemacht und dort war der Button dann nicht so offensichtlich?

Heh,

how about forcing LaLiga to show evidence about damages? Because surely everyone who pirated their content would have paid if free streams weren’t available, right guys???

True, but at that point, every website I’ll ever visit and have visited in the past might be a threat, so that doesn’t really matter too much to me.

I’ve got several hits, but none of them have permission to request my location. If I understand the README correctly, that should mean I’m safe, right?

Could be, but if they genuinely didn’t understand, this hopefully helped more than continuing the (supposed) joke.

At first, I read it that way too. However, it’s supposed to be: (School) (warns parents) (of border patrol agents boarding buses […])

If you want the magic explained, here’s a start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lempel%E2%80%93Ziv%E2%80%93Welch

Huh, really? I thought there were slightly more women than men, but maybe that depends on the economies etc.

As for your second point, yes, exactly. They don’t reproduce. So it doesn’t matter if many men get one wife each, or if a few men get many wives each, the number of pregnancies won’t change, and the number of pregnancy-related deaths won’t change either. So (again), I don’t see how polygyny helps in this situation.

Edit: This first point was wrong, but the second point still stands.

Polygyny wouldn’t solve the aforementioned problem if we suppose that the birth rate of men and women is roughly the same. If one man has many wives, some of whom even die, then several other men won’t have any wives.

Ist eine Verzauberung, die allen eigenen Kreaturen +1/+1 gibt.

I see, for me, that just looked like inclusive borders (meaning the clip is only over when it reaches the outer border), but you’re saying they should be exclusive (so the borders themselves aren’t supposed to be part of the clip)?

Das stimmt so nicht, ein Glorious Anthem o.ä. würde sehr wohl verhindern, dass sie stirbt.

I genuinely can’t tell what’s supposed to be the gore. Granted, I don’t think I’ve ever used YouTube’s clipping functionality. Is it that the “Share clip” button is grayed out?

Hardly a surprise, since Windows 10 didn’t need new hardware to run. You could install it on anything.

I’m currently setting up a 1.7.10 pack server, if you’re interested in that, drop me a PM.

Well, what problems are you trying to solve by having the classes all access each other’s data members? Why is that necessary?

Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised if screenshots are disabled in that app considering the rest, to “stop leaking sensitive information”.

Cookies required for the website to work (like that one) are totally fine and, in fact, they don’t even have to ask you about them - if they’re not used for tracking. So no, asking each time is definitely avoidable.

Not only is that headline’s grammar exceptional(ly bad), for a moment I thought the developer of Control was named Alan Wake. Like, how did they manage to butcher that so badly?

There are pros to this:

If the person you blocked can’t see your posts, they can intuit that you’ve blocked them. Then, they might try and find you on other social media to harass you even further, or shift targets to someone else.

If they can see your posts, they have no idea they’ve been blocked, similar to Reddit’s shadow bans. This might make them think you’re just annoyed or rarely look at your DMs, making them invest even more time to uselessly try to contact you.

Of course, I can see the other side too, that you don’t want them to know about any (new) posts you’ve made; but it isn’t as one-sided as you seem to think it is.