The whites never attempted to restore Nicholas. The attempts to do monarchy were centered on Nikolaevich during the civil war and Kiril post war.

What’s funny is that the creator of Anastasia also made another movie in which the inciting incident is the pogroms and cossack raids.

I should ask to have my post moved to badposting, so we can really run with this. Also it should be mpreg

I am not a clever man

True but it’s dark on a less literal level.

Wait this wasn’t supposed to look this dark

Reminder: Yaoi Gagarin

How dare you. Plenty of trans women also got brainworms from 4chan. /tttt/ talk infects even this place.

This is very obviously AI slop

Once Trump is out of power I’ll say that I don’t think he was the greatest president and then I’ll get a book deal.

Shit I accidentally beared first.

Becoming a conservative podcaster purely so I get acolades from libs when I say that I don’t think gays should die.

No. He’s got transworld depravity (The “technical” term). In all possible worlds this kid has bad vibes. Just as there are infinite numbers between 1 and 2 and none are 3, this toddler could manifest in an infinite amount of ways and all of them deserve leukemia, or Satan did it. And if Satan did it God couldn’t stop it in any possible worlds because of free will.

The answers to the problem of evil are

1:God isn’t real/omnipotent/good.
2: God had to make evil for reasons, usually free will.
3: As humans we’re stupid and don’t understand the whole picture.

You’ve got one of the solutions, but not a novel one and you probably dont even know the board personally so you can only be an adjunct.

I’m sure there’s a theological justification for the bible saying God can’t do a certain thing or that he doesn’t know a certain thing, or that he changed his mind. All of which to me seems inconsistent with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient being. As a person who isn’t a believer it ultimately doesn’t matter to me. What did matter to me was seeing the claim that the problem of evil didn’t just have possible counter arguments, but that it was considered solved. And that it was solved by utter nonsense.

No see God has to create an infinite amount of worlds and collapse them because he can’t create a world where people are likely to choose good.

Also Satan did the leukemia.

Don’t ask why God made Satan, okay. That’s rude.

My answer to the problem of evil may require a font of all natural evil not accountable to God. But the Problem of Evil is solved.

If your argument against “If God is good why leukemia in children” starts with “Okay so God created an infinite number of worlds and this kid had bad vibes in all of them. Also Satan did it”" you should just go to jail. Like that’s not just bad philosophy, you’re just an asshole.
I have genuinely lost so much respect for philosophy as a discipline from reading this.

As a recently christened stemlord I believe we should shut down philosophy departments. Not only because as a stemlord now I don’t believe in the value of philosophy. But most importantly because having read that the “academic philosophical community” considers the Problem of Evil solved based on the weakest and worst argument I have ever fucking heard, they might just be fucking bad at their jobs.

I fully believe, and I’m only joking a little bit here, that if you based on Platingas argument believe that we’ve debunked the problem of evil you should automatically lose your tenure. Even if you teach music composition or something.

But the whole point of the article is just that “China burns coal, we don’t burn coal more because of woke, so china will win because they’re not woke”. It’s the same bullshit they’ve been saying for my entire lifetime.