So I’d say this would cause a split but frankly everyone worth listening to has disavowed these libs years ago.
So I’d say this would cause a split but frankly everyone worth listening to has disavowed these libs years ago.
Remember kids, Lenin was nicknamed “Old Man” by his fellow revolutionaries. In his 20s.
One of these things is not like the other…
The other option is of course “Just As Panned/ I meant for you to sin all along sucker because the reconciliation is the point”.
Hillary Clinton for Republican candidate. It’s her turn
Depends on the tendency. Cliffites are often almost councilcom, and are many New Left trots who took some Maoist thought. But others are more Orthodox ML.
It comes from Trotsky’s critique of the nomenklatura, but he himself was always firm about direct Party control of the Soviets. Partially because Stalin opening up the party to his Soviet supporters was what doomed him.
Charitably Trotsky, and some Trot groups, are converging on a proto mass-line strategy here, but I’ve rarely seen it properly cohere.
It isn’t In fact, as a Luxemburgist, one of my critiques of Trots is that they want to maintain the hard control of a traditional Leninist party (which was, to be clear, the right choice for Russia and for China), rather than acknowledging the essential role and revolutionary potential of other leftist organisations in a developed, educated populace.
I’d like to note that “Trot” isn’t even a useful term anymore, as neither the Sparts nor the Cliffites nor the other major factions resemble the late thought of Trotsky (Who unlike many trots I’ve had the pleasure of reading, smart guy with some pointed critique when he can stop being so butthurt.)
Luckily I invested in pirate swords. Parliaments are now battlefields. Brings my French “74” alongside Westminster
Centrism isn’t change – not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth.
It has ever been thus. Remember when the UK forcibly deindustrialised India, causing a Dark Age in textile quality we still haven’t recovered from? (Try getting decent regency-era Chintz or Muslin, can’t be done.)
Even Chinese businesses can just throw out some Marxist Economics principles and the West reels.
responsible bipartisan
You do understand that here before October 7 the general opinion here was “Biden to the gulag, Trump to the wall” and now we’ve dropped our nice merciful opinions.
The US can’t be made better, only replaced with something better.
“Yes, wouldn’t it be nice if you were fighting the real enemy”
I actually feel a little sorry for him. Pancreatic will fuck you up so fast you barely have time to process your death. Of course, he’ll get the best conceivable care while ordinary people, even ordinary rich people, get far less or next to nothing.
Charles’ coffin is being paraded into the Abbey and suddenly Rains of Castamere starts playing.
I wish Opus Dei was a single percent as cool as what those chuds think it is instead of a slightly different, slightly smarter type of Fash.
New plot idea: Weekend at Brezhnev’s
Liberia is an absolutely wild country, America’s only formal colony (as opposed to its many, many de facto colonies in the 19th and 20th century) founded by Americans who thought black slaves should be sent back to Africa, and ruled by members of the free African American Bourgoisie. Of course no one told the people already living there, and the consequences of having a massive extractive divide between settler colonists and African cultures in the interior has had no negative effects whatsoever.
Brits drawing straight lines on maps wish they could create a country half as fucked up by design as Liberia.
“How much green power will we have to generate?”
“Only one windmill”
“Ok”
“Stalin pulls out comically large windmill”