Don’t deliver for a service that doesn’t pay you a fair wage.
Don’t deliver for a service that doesn’t pay you a fair wage.
This is a bad analogy. This isn’t like running a business. Voters don’t have a lot of choice over the product, they just have their vote. We have two choices (effectively) and some will reject a candidate over a single issue when the consequences are much broader.
Fuck you, you hateful shits.
Only one sounding hateful here is you.
Again you’re blaming the consumer but totally overlook the employer being cheap and paying shitty wages. You’re playing right into their hand.
Don’t forget that it’s the employer paying the shitty wage that is the one screwing over the worker. This is exactly what those employers want, to be able to pay shitty wages and have the blame shifted to someone else.
You don’t give a fuck, yet you’re here blabbing about it in this thread. Ok, pal.
Maybe they were referring to themselves.
In Germany it’s typical to do so just to make the change easier, you might catch an angry glance by making them make small change.
Italy will list a coperto or servizio on the menu.
The percentage is non-zero. But if you are really concerned about the percentage, you probably shouldn’t rely on this method. It’s a judgement call.
No idea. But it’s worth considering that there are cases where you might not have the opportunity to power it down.
One second officer, let me just power down my phone real quick.
Do you really want to know the truth or do you want to play your new game \o/
Caring for others doesn’t require religion.
They don’t use or park on them… they travel on them (or whatever bullshit they say).
Dunno but probably worth it for the amount of transactions they process.
Glad to see someone say this. It’s a total appeal to authority argument. With they would’ve explained why they think it’s bad and let us come to our own conclusion.
When I did groceries with a bike I just used a backpack and made more frequent trips. I think it was practical because going more frequently meant I had more fresh foods and could get just a thing or 2 to utilize other things I already had on hand. It also helped get in a little extra exercise. Granted, this was shopping for 2 and not 4.
Moving things is still probably going to require a car but that’s more of an edge case and not a daily thing.
This is such a cynical take. NHS finds a simple change to save lives and you spun it bash on the idea of government.
Do you think it’s a waste of resources to even give him a trial? Death penalty trials are long and expensive and often cost more than lifelong incarceration. You might be okay with a low bar for having the government remove someone from society but I think the bar should be high, and the decision shouldn’t be done lightly. However, keeping that bar high also takes more resources so the issue isn’t as easy as you make it out to be.
It looks like they just took the bike rack with them.