The point of exporting weapons and training for soldiers was a socialist Revolution since these groups were communist parties or communist guerilla groups. The fact that socialism didn’t happen doesn’t mean that the attempt to export the Revolution was not there.

I see. So in which way then can the exploitation of the proletariat end?

https://www.defenceweb.co.za/featured/48-years-of-south-africa-china-defence-cooperation/

The first recruit outside of the ANC high command to be selected by Nelson Mandela to join the new uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) in 1961, Mlangeni was in the first group of six persons who went to China in 1962 for military training. China was the first country to accept MK members for training.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/17/africa/china-zimbabwe-mugabe-diplomacy/index.html

China’s involvement in Zimbabwe stretches back to the 1970s, when Beijing covertly supplied ammunition and financing to Mugabe’s guerrilla forces during the country’s war of independence. In the intervening years, China has continued to provide financial and political support to the African nation, investing extensively across a range of sectors and helping to develop key infrastructure projects.

When China trained the South African guerilla soldiers to fight and when they gave weapons to rebels to fight on Africa in general

By exporting the Revolution, I meant exporting an armed Revolution by exporting weapons and military equipment and soldiers, the way China and Cuba were doing back in the day.

So in your opinion China playing a big role in BRICS is enough of the role for the international proletariat?

Would you also say that the concept of exporting Revolution is just wrong?

The problem is that it obviously allows exploitation of the proletariat and concentration of capital, resulting in a myriad of social problems. It also risks giving the bourgeoisie too much power, which should be constantly put in check to make sure capital cannot touch the political institutions.

So would you say then that the Chinese economic model has to eventually become completely planned to get rid of these contradictions?

I watched this video. This video is actually the reason why I asked this question. He just briefly mentioned how the 2 economies are dissimilar and explains the Chinese Market Socialism, but he doesn’t go into detail about the Soviet Planned economy in general.

Do you know where can I get it for free?

Why do you advice against looking for friends with similar political views?

Wait, isn’t the point of creating a people’s army to fight on a revolution?

People’s Army

Great answer. Highly appreciate it comrade!

Is this a show or an instruction?

What do you mean? What worse?

deleted by creator

But it destroyed Yugoslavia and communist movements in the West. In the USA the communist movement is a no -threat to capital in its current state.

Why do they get constantly harassed by the police?

What is that?

Someone just asked him on his server and he replied as to why he didn’t want to go into the politics of the conflict