Could be something as simple as computers just being screwy sometimes. Or something as unlikely but still precedented as a bit-flip caused by an excited electron causing something important to actually be affected.

It’s always big data, isn’t it?

A motion sensor would get tripped by anything that passes by, but even so, a basic image processing algorithm designed just to detect whether that thing is a human or not would be more than sufficient, there’s no need to identify specific people by face.

To be fair, if Metaverse did integrate something like this they would definitely record telemetry data “for development purposes”.

He who keeps the old akindle, and adds new knowledge, is fit to be a teacher an inventor.

They hacked a nuclear lab to ask for what would be genetics research… facepalm

Modern times are really “people should get off of X platform but don’t because people don’t want to move”.

More like “people should get off of X platform but don’t because people they regularly interact with don’t want to move, and because herd mentality”

It’s the same reason why people tolerate YouTube’s bullshit. The audience won’t switch to a platform without content, and the content creators won’t switch to a platform without an audience.

I’m not saying it wouldn’t be an issue, ideally this kind of stuff should be banned whether there’s a workaround or not, because the average user is still going to have to deal with. My point is that, well, if you build a 10 foot wall, someone’s going to make a 12 foot ladder to get over it.

The system relies on an encryption key stored on the device, right? That’s actually a really stupid idea if you don’t want people breaking that encryption. Someone’s eventually going to figure out how to access that. Even the Nintendo Switch, previously notorious for being a completely airtight system, has been jailbroken.

So, in other words, I’ve been halucinating the fact that these services work perfectly fine on my Omnirom-patched OnePlus 7 Pro?

Except you’re not forced to use the Play store if you’re using a non-Google fork of Android. So unless they’re locking out the entire OS if it doesn’t authenticate (which, if they do, that runs afoul of interoperability protections), you can still install APKs directly.

Also, if it’s at the silicon level, that’s not even in the OS, that’s in the device and Google is going to have to bet on device manufacturers (particularly Samsung, due to their market share) playing along. If Samsung in particular decides that Google is going too far (and they could, they have their own reputation to worry about and they’re also going to want to have control over the devices they make - control that Google could potentially deny them as they continue to tighten their grip), that’s game over. Google could try to push their own hardware but Samsung has too much market dominance in the mobile device hardware sector for Google to challenge like that.

The solution is the same, though. Chances are non-Google Android forks aren’t going to implement this, just like how Chromium-based browsers that aren’t Chrome (or Edge) ended up implementing solutions for the depreciation of webRequest in Chromium’s implementation of MV3. So if Google does do this, just unlock your device’s bootloader and flash Omnirom or another Android fork onto it.

So, what they’re basically doing is loading straight from long-term storage into each core’s memory cache, and just running a crapton of cores? That’s actually a pretty good idea provided your long-term storage access speed is fast enough.

Chromium as a whole or just Chrome specifically?

Off the top of my head, I can think of Lumenier and Lynxmotion. They’re kits but the electronics are plug-and-play (well, solder-and-play in the case of Lumenier, but just for the power connections). They vastly outperform DJI’s drones due to their lightweight construction, and are vastly more configurable as they’re designed to use off-the-shelf hobby parts as opposed to DJI’s completely proprietary designs.

BLADE used to make a direct competitor to the DJI Phantom series in the form of the Chroma. Unfortunately they’ve completely left the multirotor market simply because DJI was able to build more market share via big-box stores vs BLADE only selling through specialty retailers, even though the Chroma was superior to the Phantom in performance and feature set.

This is one of the reasons why I tell people to stay away from DJI. There are much better brands out there, the only “appeal” DJI has is that any random person can walk into a Best Buy and buy one, whereas you have to go to an RC specialist shop for most of the others.

Is this being baked into Chromium itself or just Chrome? If it’s Chromium itself I guarantee you a lot of the various third-party Chromium browsers are going to jump ship, or remove that from their builds.

I mean, it will, because unfortunately there’s still a ton of people who have that whole “So? Everyone does it, and they already have my info anyway. And there’s nothing we can do about that so why bother.” mindset.

Still, this is going to cause a massive privacy lawsuit.

The only reason I can think of for people to be downvoting you is if they think you’re talking about the car company, not Nikola Tesla. Probably should have used his full name.

Though the system he came up with was, well, flawed for lack of a better word.

Ok, then… tell me. What browser do you use? Do you have a cell phone? Is it an Android phone? Because I guarantee you that unless you’re still using Internet Explorer and have an iPhone, you are using open source software. The Chromium engine used by both Edge and Chrome is open source, with Google as the primary contributor. Some interface elements are proprietary but many of them carry over to full FOSS Chromium browsers like Opera and Vivaldi. Well, what about Firefox? Also fully FOSS. The basic framework of Android is an ARM-compatable fork of Linux.

I’ve found LibreOffice to actually be EASIER to use than Microsoft Office, and on top of that at this point Microsoft Office formats are almost perfectly supported. The only thing that doesn’t carry over is scripting because LibreOffice uses a different scripting language from Microsoft Office, but in this day and age I guarantee you that 99% of people don’t even use that anymore.

Are you in software development? Do you work with Java? Chances are, unless you work for a big megacorp, your company switched from the Oracle JDK to OpenJDK. Which, by the way, has Oracle as a major contributor and a mirror host.

Sure, there are definitely examples of open source software that are a bunch of crap. I’ve yet to find a good FOSS CAD program that has compatibility with .sldprt and .sldasm files, acceptable compatibility with .step files AND a decent interface. But most of the stuff I’ve used has been more than adequate.

One thing you have to keep in mind is that open source developers typically “eat their own dogfood” (meaning that they use the software they develop). Chances are if they made the UI bad enough that it affects their workflow, they’re going to change it so that it’s easier and quicker to use. So they might not necessarily be getting feedback from users (although that’s very rare, most open source projects maintain community networks that rival or even surpass corporations.) but they’re actively field-testing their software. And on the flip side, big corporations don’t actually give a shit about the user. If they can get away with saving a quick buck and hiring “Bubba McGeoCities” to do their UI and still get their product to sell, they will. And they won’t change it if a handful of people complain that it’s completely unusable as long as it still sells. Want to know what the worst software I’ve ever had to use was? QuickBooks Online. And it very much felt like the combination of a late 90s GeoCities site AND Baby’s First Tax Software. It makes a TON of costly mistakes (the IRS will not take “But QuickBooks said I owed X” as an excuse for an incorrect payment) and if you try to fix those mistakes the software actively tries to “correct” them back to its original, incorrect output.

As for the “freedom” aspect that gets mentioned a lot, that actually refers to the software license. Most open source software licenses give the user the freedom to copy, modify and distribute the software, with the only requirements being that the license cannot be changed with your distribution and the original developer must be accredited. The GNU GPL also requires that any other licenses used for various libraries and plugins must also be GNU GPL or similar. On the flip side, there are licenses that eliminate even the “share alike” clause, and one that outright says you can, and I quote, “do whatever the fuck you want”.

It actually does make sense. Besides the whole “getting WordPad users to buy Office” thing, there’s also the fact that they won’t have to continue updating WordPad. It’s one less thing to worry about for security and compatibility on their end. The user might not benefit from its removal, but Microsoft does.

Just pointing out that it’s not just for the sake of changing things.