Yep, he’s wearing a death skull on his hat like the SS guards at the camps like what I was talking about.

I dunno about all of Congress. Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar, Corey Bush, and Rashida Talib have stood against the regime since day 1. They shouldn’t have to be handed over.

Article:

In August, a federal court ordered the state to shut the facility down, though that order was overturned on appeal and the case remains ongoing.

Bitcoin doesn’t support this. It’s what is being mirrored, yes. But, Ethereum is kinda like the distributed operating system/network that could/would allow 24 hour trading without having a clearing-house middleman.

Ethereum has the potential to carry real world assets on its chain. Why does an share of stock have to go through a clearing house when it could be an L2 on ethereum? A company having a total of 1 million shares is no different from a L2 coin having a total number of 1 million coins. They can even be fractional too.

Sounds like a comment from someone who will “unexpectedly” get dragged through broken glass by ICE one day because they voted for it but claim they “didn’t” vote for it.

Maybe, but one less MAGAt is still one less MAGAt—no matter who it is.

A fool and their money are soon parted.

Time for a strike?

On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.

I guess that kinda depends on the business structure. Are they fully owned and operated by the main corporation? Or are they licensees of the store’s name and brand? If it’s the first one, some humdrum middle manager could do what you said. If it’s the later, those surveillance things could be trespassing.

Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store’s parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It’s kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

If they’re on a store’s parkinglot, they’re trespassing if they’re there without the store’s consent. That means they can be removed.

deleted by creator

I really hope Republican states are the ones that will suffer the consequences of their voting.

I dunno. Mar-a-lago is probably a prime target.

I really hope the comming insurgent attacks (like 9/11) target Republican states. Democrats voted against this, and the consequences need to be born by Republican states.

Michael Green, a really big Wallstreet portfolio manager, says that 140,000 might be the new poverty line. So, that might be a pretty good guess?

Is this title suggesting that the only good Republican is a dead Republican? It sounds like this title is suggesting that the only good Republican is a dead Republican. I wonder if the only good Republican is a dead Republican. I’m going to need to think on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican. Does anyone else have any thoughts on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican to help me contemplate on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican?