I’m asking for reasons as to why to critically support Russia as opposed to Ukraine

One is allied with the world’s colonial hegemon that has been committing genocides and invasions everywhere, is openly run by nazis, has been involved in helping NATO conquer at least Syria and Iraq, and has been carrying out terror attacks on behalf of the genocidal empire of NATO.

Where the aggressor is still less moral due to being the invader.

Attempting to join NATO, threatening to bring NATO’s weapons and troops to the borders of is targets, and threatening to engage in terror attacks is an act of aggression. Furthermore, Ukraine has also invaded at least Syria and Iraq.

Also, seriously, what’s with the ‘full-scale invasion’?

Isn’t it funny how people like you - for whom the English language is supposedly their first one - can’t read even singular sentences?

I can tell you that that comment does not say that this law makes it explicitly illegal to do that. Not that it would have mattered, as people are being arrested for opposition to the genocide in question - including when they are just protesting the way you claim to be perfectly fine and legal, - i.e. even the central point that you tried to make is wrong.

On the contrary. A post with (currently) 45 upvotes states exactly “Thinking of putting up Palestine stuff in my windows just to dare them to come get me.”

Notably, it doesn’t say what you claim it says. You need to learn to read English.

This is exactly what I mean. Putting up Palestine stuff is just fine, perfectly legal, and you cannot be arrested for it.

You can. People have already been arrested for protesting against the genocide. With this law being the justification.

PA probably aren’t terrorists, just protesters who took it a bit too far

They didn’t take it too far. If you think that opposing a genocide is ‘taking it too far’, then you have no basis for objecting to being called a nazi.

but the facts are: they broke into an airbase and damaged RAF jets by pouring paint into their engines.

Yeah, and? If you think that sabotaging a nazi state’s warplanes is bad, then it’s pretty obvious where you stand.

This will take those jets out of commission until the damage has been assessed

Good.
You are yet to bring up any reason to believe that PA did something bad.

which is a cost that could run into millions because jet engines aren’t exactly cheap

Good. The more the nazi states are hindered, the better.

So a case could be made that they are also terrorists, but it’s a bit of a stretch.

In that case, every non-official group that opposed such things as the Holocaust and the Lebensraum, Manifest Destiny, NATO’s invasions of Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, etc., the European colonial rule over most of the world, and the like are all ‘terrorists’. The only people who aren’t are members of official militaries and the people who support those things, it seems.

“rooting out opposition to the genocide” No, we’re not doing that.

That is exactly what you have been doing.

There’s plenty of opposition and it’s fine

Let me guess, all of this opposition that you think is ‘fine’ is of the completely ignorable sort?

we live in a democracy

Says the person who lives under a literal monarchy with plenty of hereditary ruling positions, and where the vast majority of people have no say in what the state does.
Also, if you think that you live in a democracy, that means that you should bear responsibility for what your state does, as that would mean that you have a say in what your state does. That indicates that your state perpetrating a high-profile genocide is approved by you.

and people are free to support whoever they want to support (in this case: as long as it’s the Palestinians in general, not Hamas).

Ah yes, as long as they don’t support any resistance to the genocide.
Also, people like you who can’t even form a coherent thought for why supporting Hamas (and other groups that are resisting the genocide) is supposed to be bad, but want to keep repeating that cliche are quite silly.

Because they broke into an airbase and damaged some RAF planes.

I.e. they opposed the genocide. That is a good thing.

That was the problem, not protesting about the war in Gaza, which is still legal.

‘Protesting’ doesn’t do anything (not on its own, at least). It is completely ignorable if the actually relevant actions that protesting might gather support for are illegal.

Going to note again that you are a nazi bootlicker.

As a native English speaker who knows to varying degrees a few other languages I know it’s a tricky language so I wanted to clarify the distinction between “Palestine Action” and “Palestine action”

Notably, nobody is confused about the difference. You, however, seem to have a hard time understanding that, and you also seem to be confused about how branding PA as terrorists and rooting out opposition to the genocide are related.

You were explained to that you are being called a ‘nazi’ because you are a genocide supporter. It seems that you have a hard time understanding written English speech.

For those for whom English is not their first language, this means the group named “Palestine Action”. It does NOT mean “action and other stuff in favour of Palestine”.

You seem to be hard of thinking. Why do you think PA is being branded as terrorists if not to stifle opposition to the genocide?

Imagine equating a state and related movements that massively improved working-class people’s lives, including in terms of life expectancy, literacy rates, including by providing guaranteed housing, universal healthcare, fundamental women’s rights that are taken for granted today, and which not only fought off settler-colonialism in the form of the Lebensraum and the Holocaust, but also helped many other countries liberate themselves from European powers, with things like Germany under NSDAP, the US, Pissrael, and NATO in general.

It’s the soviet onion.

Guaranteed housing has not been a thing since 1998. The end of an era.

On that note, despite all my knowledge saying that planned economies are interested in implementing guaranteed housing, and despite that conclusion/conjecture being supported by every case that I have encountered information on so far, I would like to ask for sources with confirmation of this fact, including ones in Putonghua. Can you point to any such sources.

The hukou system means many are effectively guaranteed housing

Is everybody (barring some individual cases of people falling through the cracks) guaranteed to be provided housing? If not, then that’s not it. If yes, then why do there seem to be quite a lot of homeless people, and why is the price of housing a concern at all?

‘But how will they afford college???’

It is curious that the Chinese state is willing to pursue many forms of macroeconomic policy but seems to avoid some of the more basic socialist policies like working rights and wages.
Is this some neoliberal erosion of imagination and class struggle in the CPC or is there some justification from their part? Is that justification one that holds up to scrutiny?

This is a natural consequence of private property and the profit motive’s presence in an economy.

Hell, if homes are ‘for living, not for speculation’, then the PRC should do what the USSR (and, I’m pretty sure, pre-liberalisation PRC) did - provide guaranteed housing. That is, however, not possible unless and until the PRC adopts planned economy again.

Israel and Russia have been throwing around a lot more bombs than America

You are demonstrating a complete lack of ability to research things you decide to talk about.

50,000-rouble – the equivalent of £200,000 today

How did they calculate this? This seems completely off.

EDIT:
Some quick searches indicate that, after converting from the Soviet ruble to British pound in 1941, and then accounting for inflation, we get the figure of around 58 059 000 pounds - greater by two orders of magnitude.

Why did he get out of the hole?

But if India is fascist so is America, Italy, Poland (new regime), the Netherlands (under Wilders), etc.

They are. They literally can’t stop engaging in colonialist atrocities.

Edit:

The BJP is not making comments to annex other nations, tightening the rule of law, passing discriminatory policies

Are you sure about that?

Waowls

Why are you bringing up “America” (by which you actually mean The U.S.) as if I somehow brought it up in this comment chain?

Western ‘technofeudalism’