TripleZ

Well, it seems to me that all of the removed posts seem to be accompanied by valid reasons as to why they were removed. Maybe it would help if people read the actual posts/post titles that were removed instead of bandwagoning on dumping on lemmy.ml.

Well, other than convincing me that Nijjar might have been an actual terrorist, I still don’t see how it’s evidence that India did anything. The article about suspicious deaths even lays doubt on the claims: While his supporters claim that he was poisoned, reports suggest he had been suffering from blood cancer. The UK police later said they were not investigating the death because it was deemed “not suspicious”.

Either way, the point still stands that there is no evidence that has been presented. The constant claim of “we have ‘credible’ evidence that we cannot share” is a song-and-dance that I’ve seen too many times. Am I saying India didn’t do it? No. Nor am I saying that they did it. The statements have had a negative impact for security both for Indian and Canadian citizens. At the very least, it would be in the public interest to release whatever evidence they claim they have.

It’s interesting how people are instantly assuming that India is responsible for the murder. It is based on what? The words of Trudeau, who tells us it’s from an unnamed source (apparently the Five Eyes). We cannot have actual evidence because it’s all Intelligence stuff. It’s a “Trust us bro” moment, and I have no trust for the people who keep feeding us lies about Iraq, Russia, China, etc.

What’s the point of holding an election? Hasn’t he banned all opposition parties already?

The particular instance you are in may be a factor in the posts you see. It’s the same as Lemmy, you can be on Lemmy.ml, or Lemmygrad, or Lemmy.world and the posts you see may change. It may be better to find an instance that works for your interests.

I wouldn’t be classifying labour as skilled or unskilled. Labour is Labour. That said, I think the premise has changed. In the past, one would think that automating manual labour would be easier, however, as of right now, I believe this has changed drastically. Jobs that require a long study time, but not much manual intervention such as lawyers, doctors (not surgeons), journalists, accountants, etc might end up being replaced by AI. I personally believe that these jobs are more at risk with the advent of AI than other more manual jobs.