Didn’t Trump win partially by the black vote going for him? How do we know most of those weren’t for Trump?
Didn’t Trump win partially by the black vote going for him? How do we know most of those weren’t for Trump?
You mean deleting them? And running off people who disagree? Good job. I’ve been here like two days I’m getting ready to leave.
Eh point still stands, I wouldn’t use an edit of bike cuck to make a point unless the point was to satirize his original point.
Well some things might change but I’m just saying people overestimate how much will change.
I don’t feel like verifying that all of them happened directly but I can say at the very minimum the last dot isn’t something he did. Because… you know. Reality.
He’s doing at least half of those things. Depending on how you view things.
This is what I ordered. Not how you famed it but the exact thing I wanted I am getting here. So… not too worried.
Tune it out. Nothing ever changes by a change in political leaders alone. People are just going crazy because the terminally online lost the election.
In like what parts of the world tho?
Also technically humans invented the idea of an invasive species. Otherwise it’d just be nature taking its course.
First pass the post suuuuucks. Literally anything else is at least slightly better.
Yeah. I voted third party in 2020, which effectively did nothing.
I did not make the same mistake twice, good did something this time.
Wouldnt each side accuse the other of that specifically whilst believing their own side doesn’t?
I’m guessing that’s the point of the question.
I’m gonna be honest this is a dumb way to view these issues. “You’re either with me or against me” just fuels an “us vs them” mentality that leads to hate and division more than anything. It shows that you’d rather label people as “the enemy” than try to understand other perspectives. Also this is the bike cuck guy. Just saying.
I mean I imagine if someone went to a liberal/satanist establishment and asked for a cake celebrating the overturn of roe v wade they would refuse. And rightfully so.
Ok but how are plants not being exploited? Also it could be said that you can get meat without exploiting animals, such as getting rid of invasive species. At a certain point it’s not a diet it’s an ideology, and I feel they should have separate names. Because let’s say you’re just against exploitation of living organisms, then you’d be fine with eating invasive species, or meat hunted yourself, but deny eating anything from a farm.
I’d say when it comes to veganism it’s basically up to what you personally want to eat. I personally have no moral quandary with eating animals but if you do, I wouldn’t call you a hypocrite for eating jellyfish. Plants feel pain too, in a similar way, I could see it being justified. Taxonomy shouldn’t decide your morality.
Keep in mind that minimum wage makes it harder to get a job in the first place (supply and demand) and a higher minimum wage causes inflation.
Just… something to note there. If minimum wage wasn’t so high more 16 year Olds would get jobs while they still live with their parents and can afford having low wages - so they have experience later.
Effectively what we have right now is a paradox where you need experience to get a job, but every job requires a certain amount of experience. This is because of the minimum wage, companies literally cannot afford to train people on the job.