get this liberal nonsense out of here please.

can you see how admitting that reaganite endorsements = a surefire strategy is an indictment of the entire american political system, and leaves the only sane choice of dismantling the american state-machine before it does even more genocide

Q:So rights are not some sort of universal thing that every person has. They’re something that you can win or lose.

A:That’s right.

These people look at the Holocaust and think “Hmm. Maybe we could do that to Arabs…”

Meanwhile every Palestinian I’ve heard interviewed, even after being constantly attacked by Israel, wants to live in peace with all faiths and understands their fight isn’t with Judaism but with a European colonial project of Zionism.

It is better than voting because you will help create the world in which we no longer have to choose between red or blue genocide, and more importantly no longer need to hash these dumb online arguments every 2 years

Ok so try political change that destroys a system that forces you to vote for blue or red genocide every 2 years

Better than voting would be to join a communist party and work towards dual power, especially in your workplaces/unions

I think you should join a communist party and work towards building some dual power

I’m not voting for a guy that enables genocide.

why

The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying This is mine, and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows, "Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody.

even some liberals knew this

could have became anything and picked becoming a dipshit

They are pretty good where I live supporting the Palestine protests and worker marches, not a member but they seem to be growing decently. Don’t agree with all their rhetoric but at the end of the day I would rather have them growing as an alternative to the NDP

He and Guglielmo Carchedi wrote a book called Capitalism in the 21st Century: Through the Prism of Value. I’m about halfway through definitely worth reading imo. It’s more of a general view of capitalism but it reads similar to his blogs.

the author as he was writing this:

As future wargaming strategies go, this one may not be uppermost in Rishi Sunak’s mind when he flies to Poland today to discuss Ukraine with Donald Tusk. For a start, it rather downplays the small issue that putting western troops east of Poland’s border might spark world war three. Yet should Mr Sunak happen to browse the policy journal Foreign Affairs while on the plane to Warsaw, he would learn that in the world of thinktanks, at least, the unthinkable is finally being thought

Anyone proposing this needs to be guillotined

Not to mention that the rate of profit reached it’s height during that time, and it’s not reaching that again (unless ww3 comes around)

It’s honestly a kinda lame speech and the fact that even that was too much for the German state is very telling

Haskel said he was worried about the high level of wages growth. He added that interest rates should remain high until there was evidence that wages growth had settled at a lower level.

It’s 2024 and the liberal high priests of capital still do not have a proper theory of inflation.

Wishing all Philips-curvecels a very Merry

Does contemporary Marxism still consider feudalism to be a unified mode of production? I’ve heard some historians say that there was never such a thing as indivisble feudalism, rather that there were different modes sort of interacting during this time which taken as a whole compose our conception and stereotypes of what feudalism means.

Could China during that time be considered feudal, or is it specifically a western European thing?

Try it