





Don’t be looking for reason in racism. I grew up in Eastern Europe and truth be told, I can’t claim to be free of it myself. The story rings believable to me…


Over and over and over again…
Normally, if you see an Indian-looking fellow in the Balkans, they’re probably Romani.
Fuck
Just lost the game


deleted by creator
Running that LLM on an organic potato, I see…


9/10 times it’s a legit problem, the neighbour would just ask you nicely. If some nutjob writes you an invoice, you can safely ignore it. Going through someone’s trash and photographing indentifying information on the other hand is a felony, so OOP might’ve just found a way to finance that lawyer for themselves.
But this is one side of a story in which the neighbour went from 0 to lawyer with no warning and OOP (presumed innocent and tidy) is apparently fed up with the entire country because of that. Seems to me pretty escalatory by the only side presenting the narrative.
So giving the benefit of the doubt to the othe side: if you are a messy tenant and do not listen to reason, good riddance to you.


Sieht so aus, als hättest du 0 Reue und wolltest quasi nur die Konsequenzen minimieren.
Was erwartest du jetzt von uns? Unterstützung? Los, Joachim, klau dir was du willst, deine Diebeskollegen haben’s dir ja vorgemacht… 😮💨


Nothing above Turing-completeness (if even that) is strictly necessary. But as OP had pointed out in other comments, pronouns have a practical use.


Nah, it’s just a single differentiation between people and non-persons, e.g. him vs that.
There are gender-free languages that still make this distinction, e.g. Hungarian ő vs az.
To add to the subject of complexity, in English you have 3 genders, 2 numbers (singular/plural), and 4 cases, totalling a maximum of 24 pronouns. A gender-free language would just set the first factor to 1. Adding differentiation by e.g. status would increment (in cases of there being one extra formal gender for the 3rd person) or multiply it (when there are different versions for all pronouns).


This question has a false premise and thus makes no sense.
Many natural languages are already genderless, so your question is equivalent to: “In genderless and sexless languages, what are pronouns based on?”, implying that there has to be some sort of gender-based polymorphism among pronouns.


No. Ghosts are bound by contract to the screening shooting location, not the props.


The Swiss sometimes like to put potatoes in their pasta. Me, I agree with your mum.


We used to call standard issue glasses with similar frames “pedo glasses” because that’s just how they look. If they didn’t want people to call them pervert glasses, maybe they shouldn’t have made them look so pervy…


thus: 𓁨

Vote the Golden God for district 37 comptroller!



Software developer
I thought there’d be more of us…