Ist aber halt auch nicht das erste Mal das (nicht nur Funk) mit solchem Quatsch aufgefallen ist. Es kommt halt immer und immer wieder vor.
Ist aber halt auch nicht das erste Mal das (nicht nur Funk) mit solchem Quatsch aufgefallen ist. Es kommt halt immer und immer wieder vor.
I honestly don’t get why so many people are so upset.
I get it with things like insulin where we know how to make it for years. But a new revolutionary drug? Sure their production cost is low but that doesn’t include R&D and just think of how many drugs don’t work. That’s why when we do find something that works we can’t expect it to only pay for itself, it has to make enough buck to basically pay for them as well, because why else even bother?
Ohhh eine Runde Mitleid
Ich finde es lustig wie sich hier alle über den Preis aufregen, wenn ein verlinkten Artikel sogar steht: " Den neuen Preis hatten Pfizer und der GKV-Spitzenverband auf Basis einer positiven Nutzenbewertung durch das Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG) und dem darauf beruhenden G-BA-Beschluss ausgehandelt. Demnach wurde dem Covid-19-Medikament ein »Anhaltspunkt für einen beträchtlichen Zusatznutzen« bescheinigt. "
Wow. Das ist ja schön ziemlich hinterfotzig. Zuerst so tun als würde man sich nur an allgemeine Titelkonventionen halten und man sei ja komplett neutral und dann 5 Kommentare tief sagen: ich hab das so übernommen weil das auch meine Meinung ist.
Das ist aber doch kein Artikel sondern die Pressemitteilung eines Staates, oder siehst du da keinen Unterschied?
Jo. Bist ja nicht die Namibische Pressestelle oder?
Eine wertungsfreie überschrift wäre Zb. Namibia verurteilt die Deutsche Unterstützung Israels vor dem ICJ. Nennt Israel einen “rassistischen Staat” und bezichtigt Israel “genozidalen Absichten”. Etc.
Ansonsten wird man annehmen dass du dir diese Aussagen zu eigen machst und nicht nur einen interessanten Standpunkt eines Afrikanischen Staates mit uns teilen willst.
Der Titel geht ja schon echt gar nicht.
PS: OP war nie an einer sachlichen Diskussion interessiert. “Klar, wenn man sich davon distanzieren will, wird man das evtl. machen. Will ich aber nicht” https://lemmy.ml/comment/7368353
Lol that’s like the same thing that happend with Stuttgart 21 where they agreed that the State had to pay 21% but 21% of the then projected cost. Now the DB and thus the Federal Government have to shoulder the cost explosion themselves.
Also back to main topic. It would be so hilarious to see the faces of all the internet warriors fighting for “cheap” and “reliable” nuclear energy seeing how THE EDF has to abandon their nuclear reactor because they will never ever ever get a return on their investments.
Why would you want 15ct energy in 20 years when you can get 7ct energy right now??
It’s a balancing act for sure. You have to understand what’s good for the climate isnt necessarily good for the environment. However I believe we have to understand that cleaning up the plastic in the world is imho harder than recapturing co2 since you can’t just build a big machine wherever you want and it does it’s job. Plastic you have to hunt down manually, and good luck doing that for micro plastics
But I don’t think your example works as well as eg plastic Vs glas bottles. Your energy dilemma can be solved simply by having photovoltaic panels and/or hooking the dishwasher up to a renewably generated hot water supply.
Also even in your calculations which I assume are not optimised 2000+ wash cycles is only like 6 years of use. And I still think that’s a no brainer.
Well for one: most of the things listed already have a solution:
Food? Glassware and Metal containers. Or Even reusable single type plastic containers, like a tupperware.
Sterile medical supplies already are packed in a paper bag. The ones that are in plastic actually aren’t.
Medicine can also be packed into glass and metal containers.
Beverages can be put in cans or Reusable Glass bottles or you simply drink tap water. (I know in some countries that’s not safe but it should be)
And honestly your cafeteria is the most ridiculous example. Get a dishwasher and use real cutlery. Or bring your own cutlery from home. (Is it actually a cafeteria or just a glorified break room?)
Tbh, the only thing that’s changed is that the state prosecutor put it on a list of hate speech slogans. Nothing really changed. Hate speech was always illegal in Germany. And you can’t really be surprised Pikachu face at the news that German officials are a lot more sensitive against stuff that is actively in use as a rallying frase by actual Terrorists.
But to the Article itself: I don’t get the later part of this paragraph, and looks to me almost like ai generated.
The Stuttgart German-Israel Friendship Association claims to be pro-Israel, but receives its funding from the German Foreign Ministry. The lack of independence, critics argue, has turned German-Israel Friendship associations into paper tigers who won’t assertively confront their local, state and federal governments about hardcore pro-Iran and anti-Israel policies.
German-Israel Friendship associations are just that: Associations, not official agency’s.
And “hardcore pro-Iran and anti-Israel policies”???
Is there a source for the Chibi?
Article is gone. Here’s the archived link: http://web.archive.org/web/20231021113141/https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-government-discovers-theft-of-foreign-aid/
Why? I mean if I post a picture of good food you wouldn’t be upset because you can’t eat it too for free?
Warum das gleiche nochmal?
Yeah how dare they demand a price for their product/service. They should just learn to live off views and exposure.
Die Bahn gehört 100% dem Bund