Sorry to be so snarky but this is essentially the neolib talking point of “new technologies will solve climate change” while vaguely gesturing at a future utopia.

If we cannot imagine the kind of change in our environment, then there won’t be people who “breathe” the anarchist revolution. Every single change in human history had to be thought first and then turned into a reality.

I was wondering how you’d get your foot out of a bidet

Volltrunkene Demokratische Grundordnung

Keine Ahnung, aber: “beating around the bush” kann man herrlich mit “Um den heißen Brei herumreden” übersetzen.

Ich würde den letzten Satz ich-bezogener formulieren. …, muss ich ihr Angebot ablehnen. “Sollten Sie ihr Angebot zurückziehen” klingt sehr anklagend.

I… I confused duvet and bidet for a solid minute…

Improvised Uterine Device

“Mitläufer”. A German Term for people who don’t revel in their role, don’t actively contribute to the suffering, but just “let it run its course”.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/executions-began-when-war-ended-iran

I think, this is a better take on the situation than whatever cfr wrote.

Skortkets

deleted by creator

In this thread alone there are two people calling all immigration bad.

Oh Peterson is extremely annoying. His preferred style of discussion is essentially an upgraded version of the Shapiro method:

1. Throw out an argument
2. When this argument is attacked, immediately derail the discussion to talk about definitions
3. Whenever it seems like your opponent tries to define something by using a different word, interrupt them by questioning the definition of that word.

It’s the idea of platonic ideals but perverted, so that you cannot ever describe things, because to describe you have to use other things to compare them to. Critically, he never uses this argument against himself. His definitions, however circular they are, are unassailable and end up so distorted that he essentially creates his own language.

Take the word “believe”. To Peterson, this is defined as “willing to give up your life before renouncing a thing”. Who TF uses this word that way?

the occupiers

How dare Ukrainians use Ukrainian spellings.

Good

There wouldn’t be a dick joke. You’d be a disgusting monster, preying on children and murdering people, and you’d be portrayed as the ugliest and fattest human ever. Wearing a beret and eating baguette, to subtly hint at your frenchiness. Because J.D. Rowingboat hates trans people so much, she’s willing to enter alliances with self proclaimed fascists.

Classic Erdogan shit

Glad you recognized the sarcasm

Critical Support for the Tatmawdaw? Tf is this alignment xD

Every soldier is an unfeeling, child eating monster. Humanizing them is bad, we don’t want them to be seen as humans.

For some reason, this image makes me indescribably sad.