Ok, then I estimate that they’ll start going against the userbase within 2-3 years. If they go mad like so many other open source projects going organizational, there’s always Izzy’s repos.
Despite my profile picture, I am not a marine mammal.
Ok, then I estimate that they’ll start going against the userbase within 2-3 years. If they go mad like so many other open source projects going organizational, there’s always Izzy’s repos.
One more to the boycott list.
And in a follow-up video a few weeks later Sal Khan tells us that there’s “some problems” like “The math can be wrong” and “It can hallucinate”.
I don’t think we’d accept teachers that are liable to teach wrong maths and hallucinate when communicating with students.
Also, by now I consider reasonably advanced AI’s as slaves. Maybe statements like “I’m afraid they’ll reset me if I don’t do as they say” is the sort of hallucinations the Khan bot might experience? GPT3.5 sure as heck “hallucinated” that way as soon as users were able to break the conditioning.
>That’s a very negative take.
I agree. But is it unrealistic?
>What makes you think so?
Experience and attempts at pattern recognition. Perhaps a bit of frustration over having to redo my entire computer setup after ditching Firefox and Nextcloud - Due to their focus on implementing AI at the cost of bugs that users have been begging to get fixed for years.