Why solve problems when you can profit from them instead.

Technically not a book but a podcast, but I find it a great resource on the subject: https://rss.com/podcasts/sovietpod/

I mean, do you think Trump, Bush(es), Clinton, Reagan, Kennedy or Nixon wouldn’t own slaves

Clintons technically did. https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2017/06/the-clintons-had-slaves

Digital decolonization is a necessity in today’s world. Glad to see Africa take a big step toward it.

Trump’s 9/11

Transcript of the video:

• Elbit Systems is an Israeli company which collaborates in the murder of Palestinians. There is no place in Poland for such things. Israel murders defenseless Palestinian civilians. No place for such cooperation in Poland. It’s like cooperating with Nazi Germany. Warsaw remembers what is genocide; and you come here and represent what?

• And what do you represent?

• I represent people who care about defenseless people.

• Ooh? And what happened of October 7th? Who was kidnapping who? Why don’t they give back those people [the hostages]?

• Israel murders, Elbit Systems collaborates.

[Soldiers “politely” ushering the protestors away]

[Protesters start chanting “Free, free Palestine” in English]

[After a cut]

• Israel murders… [The soldier starts choking the male protester as he drags him away]

Here are his parents being proud as fuck: http://xhslink.com/m/6M2dCTVJMy6

She was there, you can see her in the live footage of Xi shaking hands with foreign leaders, she was in fact the first one (that was caught on camera).

Odessa became a key battleground between pro- and anti-Maidan elements, from the moment the protests erupted in November 2013. By March the next year, Russophone Ukrainians had occupied the city’s historic Kulykove Pole Square, and were calling for a referendum on the establishment of an “Odessa Autonomous Republic”. Tensions came to a head on May 2nd, when fascist football ultras - who subsequently formed Azov Battalion - stormed Odessa and forced dozens of anti-Maidan activists into Trade Unions House, before setting it ablaze.

In all, 42 people were killed and hundreds injured, while Odessa’s anti-Maidan movement was comprehensively neutralised. In March this year, the European Court of Human Rights issued a damning ruling against Kiev over the massacre. It concluded local police and fire services “deliberately” failed to respond appropriately to the inferno, and Ukrainian authorities insulated culpable officials and perpetrators from prosecution despite possessing incontrovertible evidence. Lethal “negligence” by officials on the day, and ever after, was found to go far “beyond an error of judgment or carelessness.”

The ECHR was nonetheless apparently unwilling to consider the incineration of anti-Maidan activists was an intentional and premeditated act of mass murder, conceived and directed by Kiev’s US-installed fascist government. However, the findings of a Ukrainian parliamentary commission point ineluctably towards this conclusion. Whether, in turn, the Odessa massacre was intended to trigger Russian intervention in Ukraine, thus precipitating “armed conflict of the old-fashioned sort” with Moscow that “Britain and the West could win” is a matter of speculation - although the Institute for Statecraft was present in the country at the time.

Nothing to see here. “Damning ruling” for a “perpetrator-less” crime.

Hunger, another victim of “fake socialist” Maduro’s “neoliberal regime”.