Depends, I have my opinions about some stuff of new trek but honestly I prefer to not saying nothing at all really. For example, Ortega sometimes have a undesireable behaviour in some episodes and is almost forced compared with other episodes. (Specially episode 9 season 3, Terrarium)

Or how sometimes, for some reason, universal translator don’t translate spanish words of Ortega or Captain Rios in picard.

TNG was the last thing related with terraforming. You can include Ferengi terraforming bomb in Lower Decks.

Is plausible to go faster of warp 10, but not reaching warp 11, so is nothing wrong to me.

I think a comedy is “less canon” because calling Cerritos a “California class” is more like saying “this is the most wimp or weakling starfleet ships ever”. So I believe Lower Lecks is canon, but not everything can be taked into a 100% serious story. But that’s just my thought.

So, reading a bit yesterday and reading your comment now, historically aircraft carrier enterprise was class Nimitz because, well, they like the name, so I can give an idea how can work in Star Trek. I didn’t know ships have “class” and random names, I always thought it was more logically choosen.

Sumarise: Now I know ships has random names and class with all similar ships, but class is not equal of ranks or something. Like hierarchy, that’s why I didn’t get it.

I don’t get it.

I notice california class was a joke, that’s why I ask how much is canon in general.

I look that Zhenzhou and is “Walker-class” what does class means? At least Crazy horse is from the original series, so maybe was a time of brainstorming.

I ask about target in another thread, I think Paramount dosen’t know the Star Trek target either.

We need this artstyle again. /s

Looking it now, it reminds me of those Invincible memes people made up.

Star Trek Voyager but the writers are from Star Trek Lower Decks.

I don’t know, DS9 is not that edgy and when there is extremist actions they are complained for not follow the starfleet tradition or being unethicals.

Yeah, something similar happend to somebody which watch the series with me.

Old Star Trek is really a series who you need to use your imagination to don’t notice the lame special effects, that’s something which was fixed in new Star Trek with high budget visual effects.

This reminds me to people who says bald men are evil, we are in mirror universe already?

So starfleet has quota law?

I came later to the party, but I just watch this today.

Good concept but lacks of Gene Roddenberry’s optimism.

Yes, the ending of the episode is optimistic, but I would’ve liked the Federation to feel confident and secure from the very beginning, and then, as the episode progressed, start having doubts. I understand that they want to add more nuance to the starfleet, but you know what? That’s already what Halo and Mass Effect do. (although the third Mass Effect 3 is ironically a bit more optimistic). I want them to genuinely be able to present a positive vision of the future.

Source of Harry Potter demographics: https://pro.morningconsult.com/instant-intel/harry-potter-fandom-demographics Getting almost 50-50 woman and male in a fandom is VERY hard to get.

Of course there is black people who love what Star Trek do in their universe, but they aren’t a big number of the fandom, Whoopi Goldberg is a great actress, yes, but still the fandom is predominant by white men because the story itself is more atracted to that audience.

I have to source but really, you still gonna denied it.

Still, Harry Potter is enjoyed by boys and girls, my point was not about quality, is how a story manage to get that “all audience taste” goal.

Harry Potter is demographically diverse, instead of Star Trek, even if I like Star Trek way more than Harry Potter.

deleted by creator

Yeah, I mean, is a silly complaing, but, surprisely, they complaing about that scene like “the big mistake of the movie” for some reason.