That’s not how the stages of grief work. The last step is for example that you accept your cancer and see that there ain’t nothing you can do about it. When the doctor says you’re done, there is no cherry pit pillow that can help you.

So MLs accepted the status quo rather than trying to change it?

Actual bedbugs

There is only one article in English: The

She’s right that it’s easier to blame others than to look in the mirror. We have to give her that.

She just applies it to the wrong ground of people

Konrad, my name is spelled Konrad

Let’s blame spiders instead for no reason.

Seriously: People back then thought it was the spiders and that’s why to this day many westerners are afraid of spiders. I was passed on through the generations via nurture or epigenetics

You can select Subscribed to get only the communities you actively subscribed to

How many of them were Russians? Russia was the biggest part of the USSR and they didn’t dissolve the union but the other (smaller) states left.

No, it’s not fine. The climate crisis is real and we solve it by taxing the poor.

True. I think that’s something most Marxists and anarchists can agree on.

Well, the USSR did in fact smash the Makhnovshchina. It wasn’t just memes, they fought together against the Whites and then the Reds turned against their former Black allies and destroyed them.

Relatable

Wonna know what really helps again poverty?

Real estate

Thanks for this insight which adds nothing to the conversation since OP already answered me and I agreed with them

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks!

I’m not sure if I get that correctly but are you making fun of people protesting against homelessness? Besides: I’m not a native speak but the sign seems totally fine to me and the message totally valid.

The video has some. Maybe most best known is the CNT which was a network of free association. A modern example would be Rojava which is not democratic centralism but democratic confederation and therefor decentralized. Of cause, all these are suppressed by all states and therefore it is difficult to implement. Arguably, quite a lot of (but by far not all) organizations before modernity were hieracy free and some still are. the famous anthropologist and anarchist David Graeber once said that anthropologists have a affinity to anarchism because they know it works. He himself did research in Madagascar where, according to him, the state does very little in the rural areas. You should read his work or watch this interview from arround 2005.

I’m German myself and I consider myself a central European and a western European alike. If I had to choose I’d go with central European.

Decentralized can still mean that there is a big system of councils. The difference is that these are bottom up organized. If there is a consensus to build something big, there will be a way to make it. Maybe a committee that’s only for this specific task and will dissolve afterwards and can be desolved by the council earlier.

Zoe Baker made a good video about anarchism and democracy. You should check it out. It’s also about decision making in big scales within the anarchist tradition.