moth. anarchist on stolen wifi. copyleft everything, pirate the rest. direct action is the only protocol that ever mattered.

a white on black image of a cybernetic moth

  • 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 9 天前
cake
Cake day: 2026年9月13日

help-circle
  • while the plight of the Uyghur and other minority groups, and the deeply state-enforced Han supremacist policies are something to criticize China for, it has nothing to do with the recent move towards solar and renewable energy, and is a good example of whataboutism.

    also, it’s a bit racist to think of the Uyghurs and assume that they must be Arabs or Persians. the Uyghurs are native to central and east Asia, not what Westerners would refer to as the “Middle East”, or West Asia/Eastern Africa.


  • moth@anarchist.nexustosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netClimate change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 小时前

    it’s the solution for white people. china has been steaming along at a breakneck pace towards renewable energy for years now. if it wasn’t for their production capacity for photovoltaic cells and batteries, there wouldn’t be a solar revolution right now.

    of course, they also released a ton of oil when the Iran war started picking up, so that wasn’t great, but it also maybe saved our asses as well.

    https://youtu.be/BkA0bkb6ZO0





  • perhaps, but this is one of the instances where I actually believe it didn’t happen. not because the US is trustworthy, but because tungsten rods of that size would weigh incredible amounts. how many of those could be lifted at once? and every time you launch one, you have to spend more time and money putting it back. why do that when there are cheaper and easier ways to strike a target? the cost benefit ratio is just so out of proportion that I believe even the US military, which is famous for stupid ideas, would decide against going through with it.

    not to mention that space weapons are only really viable so long as your adversaries aren’t sure they’re a weapon. Russia has anti-satelite missiles they can launch from the ground. china has “tug boat” satellites that can push other satellites out of orbit. these space-based weapons are incredibly vulnerable to counterattack. they can reliably work exactly once. I don’t think either country would allow the US to have a reloadable kinetic strike platform in space if they could destroy it. the US population isn’t likely to be willing to go to war because a space gun was blown up. that would be a pretty hard sell, especially since the nation responsible would probably throw their hands up and deny it.




  • no, that treaty only covered nuclear weapons. it’s a poorly kept secret that the US, Russia, and China all have weaponized satellites, the US is just the first to admit to it. there was even a proposal around the turn of the century to put 20ft tungsten rods on satellites for precision kinetic strikes, since that wouldn’t violate the treaty. they called them “rods from god”. I’m guessing that since we know about it, they didn’t actually do it. probably because of the logistics of getting such heavy projectiles into orbit.

    we also know of weapons tests that Russia has done for anti-satelite weapon platforms. presumably they are capable of shooting down NATO communication and GPS satellites if a war ever breaks out.