That sounds rill-y scarey.
That sounds rill-y scarey.
Also, removable batteries and waterproofing are not mutually exclusive. There have been flagships that were waterproof and had a removable battery, like the Galaxy S5. And there still are phones like that. Manufacturers have taken this away from us.
Also, also, every other industry has seemed to have figured it out. Go to the dollar store and you will find a flashlight that is waterproof and has easily replaceable AA batteries. Its not that complicated. Apple is one of the most successful companies on the planet, they can hire an engineer to come up with a decent solution. Apple et al. using waterproofing as an excuse to make the entire phone disposable when, not if, the battery dies is bullshit.
Umm, akshually. The Martian atmosphere is already 95℅ CO2. Its cold because the atmosphere is so thin. Its thin because Mars does not have a strong magnetic field like Earth does, so solar winds can strip away bits of the atmosphere. Also, Mars only has about 0.38 times the gravity of Earth, making it easier for gases to escape.
This is bad advice.
Use both hands.
neovim with vimtex as an editor.
texlive-latexmk to compile.
zathura as a viewer.
git as version control.
Why would you use an online editor?
That’s why I use LaTeX
FTFY
That’s a cup. Coup is the sound doves make.
A power companies largest expense is maintaining the grid. If their only product has to be sold at negative prices, then there is no money to pay people to maintain the grid. An under maintained gridgrid can lead to very serious consequences, ref:Texas.
When she asks “Can I have your name?”, don’t give it to her.
“Not as shit as you could be” is not something we should be praising. A handful of years is still too short, just because it is marginally better than their competitors doesn’t mean we should give Apple a pass. It just means that the industry is full of shitty companies that profit off of producing e-waste, and know that consumers have no real choice but to put up with it.
You forgot “Squish the cat”.
https://frame.work/products/western-digital-sn740-nvme-m-2-2230?v=FRANRTWD0B is in the marketplace for the Canada and US regions, but not GB. IDK, maybe a supply chain thing. Maybe a mistake.
But if your trying to buy a SSD, not a laptop, don’t buy it from Framework and pay their shipping. Just buy it from a local retailer.
I’ve had this same conversation I don’t know how many times, but about phones. Someone tells me they don’t like Android because its slow and buggy, and iPhone is so much better. Then I ask them which Android phone(s) they’ve tried and its always a loaner that is a cheap, entry level phone and/or it is used and years out of date. So of course a brand new iPhone is going to be a better experience. They don’t seem to understand that there are premium phones that use Android.
A “factory seconds” framework 13 might fit your budget, and you get a laptop that is easily repairable and upgradeable. The 11th gen i7 version that starts at $500 is what I have been using for a couple of years now and still runs great.
They also have refurbished laptops, but those seem to start a little bit more expensive.
“The Year Of Linux on Desktops”. Been hearing this for decades, but it might actually be happening.
Been hearing this for decades.
You could try this
What you’re talking about is usually referred to as a de-orbit burn. Sure somebody could call it a reentry burn, but not SpaceX. What SpaceX calls a reentry burn is the maneuver when a Falcon 9 booster lights its engines as it first hits the atmosphere to slow down and move the heating away from it’s body. Neither the super heavy booster nor the ship make a maneuver like this.
IFT3 did not make a de-orbit burn, and there is not one planned for IFT4 either.
IFT3 was technically suborbital, but only barely. Like a couple hundred km/h short. Literally a couple of seconds longer second stage burn would have put it into a stable orbit. Or the same velocity just with a lower apogee. They intentionally left the perigee just inside the atmosphere so a deorbit burn was not required. This is also the plan for IFT4, iirc. I think they are talking about the bellyflop/suicide burn. It was not planned on IFT3, but is for IFT4.
Both the booster and the ship have attitude control thrusters that you could see firing during the live stream of IFT3. Early prototypes used nitrogen cold-gas thrusters, but were planned to be upgraded to methane/oxygen hot-gas thrusters at some point. I don’t recall if/when they were.
https://www.lowes.com/pd/Design-Toscano-62-5-in-H-x-171-in-W-Multiple-Colors-Finishes-Dinosaur-Garden-Statue/5015136405