robinnist [he/him]

Victory is when you’re too stupid to understand that you’re incorrect.

“This website is sketchy because it’s not in English (it’s reporting on Ukrainian affairs)” — a genuis

You’re replying to me for free, so… the only difference is you’re wrong.

I hope you actually think I’m getting paid to talk to you. So fucking stupid.

If what I said wasn’t correct you’d be able to come up with a better reply. The Russian bot stuff is reddit nonsense and makes you look like an idiot. As for “shady websites,” I only linked one website, and is it shady to you because it’s not in English? It’s a Ukrainian news source.

Thought-terminating cliche. Congrats on lapping up propaganda for free?

Umm, wow, okay friend, these completely correct statements are actually RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA (they make Ukraine look bad). Amazing bit. Yes, not putting out public statements in favor of Israel’s genocidal campaign would really hurt their war effort against Russia. Nor could Ukraine afford to stamp out all of the Nazism in their country (they actually let it rise to new heights after Euromaidan, when Russian influence had supposedly been weakened) or end their ethnic cleansing campaign in the Donbas or else that would take attention away from the invasion that wouldn’t start for eight years.

Calling the Russian army genocidal is actually beyond absurd. Why do you think Russia invaded Ukraine? Because “Putler wanted to conquer Europe”? The liberal worldview has absolutely zero explanatory power.

You’re right, Ukraine can openly venerate Nazis while targeting Russian speakers and Roma people and Israel can massacre Palestinians at the same time!

It’s not that two things are happening at the same time you idiot, it’s Zelensky’s attitude towards what Israel is doing at the same time (this is what the comment above expressly states). “Israel has a right to defend itself” is the vapid nonsense numerous Western powers have said to justify Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people after their revolt against colonial occupation (which is condemned as “terrorism”), along with the “Israeli civilians” drivel and the refusal to recognize Israel’s part in killing their own people on the 7th—these are the same things Zelensky has said [1] [2].

What if Trump brings up being shot and Kamala makes fun of him and then it becomes okay to do suddenly?

Both will pretend to be stupid and argue on terms they know are made up nonsense but neither can call the other out on it without calling out themselves.

Post-debate news commentators will discuss the debate and provide a negative amount of insight. Nothing will change, maybe Kamala will do another “I’m speaking” epic brat girlboss moment when Trump talks over her.

I have a private bingo card and if I fill the board I’m ending my own life.

“Ummm, sweaty, people get murdered every day all over the world so it’s okay if I support murderers. Not wanting little kids to be torn to shreds by bomb attacks is actually just supporting Hamas. What does this say about supporting Hamas? It hurts my head when I think too hard about it.”

One and the same, as shown by your defense of settler-colonial genocide when the good guys^TM do it with civility and tact.

We can see the phrasing, at least in English:

It should be a criminal offence for leaders of large businesses or senior government officials to approve or permit actions they know are likely to cause damage to nature and climate that is widespread, long term or cannot ​be reversed

The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%

How exactly were the Jedi in the wrong in any regard? At most, we could say, their advised non-interference is the issue, which translates back to the fall of the Jedi being due to their transformation into Republic soldiers who put keeping their political standing over all else, which the show incorrectly and lazily flips in the direction of “predicting” their fall due to their “good intentioned” interference.

One could call the whitewashing of the cult that mind-SA’s teenagers (which “we” could justify by pointing to the Jedi’s “invasion” of the cult’s land and their “lethal enforcement of policies” to the point of refusing to fight back when being attacked and only killing when the life of the children they’re trying to protect is being put in danger) and abuses its own children in numerous ways incorrect, but we can be assured that the show puts things right when the traumatized mind-SA victim lets his walls down and drinks poison after being egged on to commit suicide by the righteously angry child of the good cult due to his guilt over too quickly going in to the mind-SA cult’s sovereign borders and “forcing” them to destroy themselves.

Ah but the Jedi did take the cult’s children (in a bit of cult infighting), in one sense, albeit only temporarily to be tested with the consent of the cult and this in the first place being triggered by the request of one of the children.

This truly evil show (as though it may be) did not make the Jedi adequately villainous in this regard, and justified their actions with such nonsense as “one of the children we were trying to protect was being turned into dust before our eyes”, or “the traumatized teenage mind-SA victim was simply eager to enter the noble enclave of the child abusing club and be done with it all.” Truly a tragedy at both ends.