• 2 Posts
  • 4.48K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle
  • No, because if you have a room empty, you now have to identify the vacated room, which could take an infinite amount of time

    Also, it would take up to an infinite amount of distance to walk to or from the front desk, so we just be dealing with immortal guests who have no time sensitivity at all

    Furthermore, the room must be made ready and guests tend to check out at a certain time of day, so you would have to decentralize everything while accounting for light speed limiting the speed of information

    Some of these problems are solvable if you add more constraints to the puzzle. Like, if you have a rate of check-in to checkout you could do something with statistics and discrete math to divide the infinity into an infinite number of sub hotels, and in doing so possibly guarantee availability for the guest in a long but linear amount of time

    It would be an interesting programming/math puzzle. My intuition tells me it is solvable, but it might not be





  • Also there’s nothing stopping you crossing state lines on foot, or a bicycle, or any other non-regulated form of transit you don’t need ID to make use of.

    Physically could you? Sometimes… Good luck going between cities safely and/or legally though. In some places it’s very possible, but most of the country cars are the only safe way to travel for any real distance

    A right that can’t be practically used isn’t a right anymore

    Also can you quickly show me where the right to travel without a government ID is enshrined? I must have missed that in my constitutional research.

    It’s the fourth amendment, being forced to present ID is a search. The State is not supposed to be able to search you just because they feel like it.

    If you could get on a bus or train without ID, it would be less of a big deal since there are practical considerations to operating a dangerous machine. But we’re becoming less free by the day

    Rights have to be fought for. They erode if you don’t push for them

    I actually just think they shouldn’t be allowed to run your plate or check your license unless there’s reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime. Such as driving in an unsafe manner


  • You need a license to operate a motor vehicle, but you shouldn’t have to submit to a search (eg presenting identification) without a reason. They should need probable cause

    Like I said, there’s practical considerations here, but the right itself has been given up in favor of enforcement

    Also, how do you actually travel between state lines without ID? It’s now required for a bus, train, or plane. You could be a passenger, but you probably can’t ride a bike or walk legally unless you cross through a town on the border. And you definitely can’t do it safely because of cars

    You could be a passenger in a private car, although police are likely to harass you if you hitchhike. And passengers are increasingly being forced to identify during traffic stops, another way the right continues to be eroded

    A right you can only practice theoretically isn’t a right




  • That’s not what I was referring to. Intelligence is basically a combination of working memory, recall, cognition, and metacognition

    The combination of these domains together produce the foundation for the “types” of intelligence, which might be more accurately described as abilities

    Humor demonstrates these qualities socially. It’s not a direct relationship, more like a demonstration. Like how dancing demonstrates physical ability, humor demonstrates the factors underlying intelligence

    (But you could also just be a good or bad dancer)









  • theneverfox@pawb.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlCome on
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just imagine him slamming together hulk hands going “it’s sundar-ing time” at the R&D offices. Then one by one punching out monitors and telling employees “you’ve been sundered”

    I’m pretty sure that’s how it happened




  • Another point is that civilisation is in many ways an extension of mass agriculture, which would presumably have been the case here. Meaning, I expect that these peoples cleared a lot of land at one time, which was later recovered by the Amazon jungles.

    Actually they used food forests - the entire Amazon has been heavily cultivated by human selection

    Families would each have their own little food forest, which was more cultivated than farmed to have their selection. But the cool thing about that practice is that it instills an idea of “I liked this fruit, so I’ll plant the seeds when I’m done”, which results in plentiful food and game animals everywhere

    How do we know all this? Their descendants are still around and still do this! It’s wild that they’re being called a lost civilization

    When the Spanish first explored the Amazon River, they reported the banks were absolutely crawling with people. When they returned most of them were gone, probably because of diseases brought by the explorers

    But for some reason those accounts were just dismissed by history, even though descendents of the survivors are still living there today