• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    152
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    No one is more afraid of facts than right-wingers.

    The BBC strongly denied this was the case and insisted the episode in question was never intended for broadcast.

    Absolute bullshit. How embarrassing for the UK.

    • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      957 months ago

      “Never intended for broadcast?”

      So what, we just rounded up all the lads on the film crew, loaded up all the cameras and microphones and shit, got in the helicopter and flew to some remote locations and had Attenborough read the prepared script just by accident, or what? Or just for the hell of it, for a laugh?

      Yeah, right.

      • @Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        IIRC (this was months ago) the episode in question wasn’t commissioned by the BBC but by a third party

          • @Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            10
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I think the BBC commissions film crews to go around the world and record nature / etc. Many times, each location shot has multiple storyboards they’re trying to fulfill for different documentaries.

            Then, that footage is available to license to be chopped up and used in any number of projects that weren’t part of the original commission.

            That’s why you see the same footage repackaged in very different ways over the years.

            So the 3rd party commission could have just been the DA narration and some short DA film clips edited over BBC content.

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      No, you see, we frequently produce full scale episodes of tv series that aren’t meant for broadcast. It’s like a sports team practicing a scrimmage. Totally normal extra practice for making the real eps.