• Rinox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    few places are exempt from that problem.

    Please provide examples

      • Rinox
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Castro and its elite didn’t have billions, right?

          • Rinox
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Google it. “Fidel Castro wealth” search turns up with various claims ranging from a net worth of 100 million to “more than 900 million $”. And that’s just a small part of what he had access to.

            When you are the sole and absolute ruler of a country, you have access to all the wealth of the state and its people (which are fucking poor) and have little to no accountability.

            .Do you really think he was as poor as all the other people of Cuba?

            Btw, source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/fidel-castros-amassed-massive-fortune-142104351.html

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Oh yeah, the famous Forbes claims of Castro being rich because “he had control of the state in a communist country where the means of production belonged to the state”. No reference to his frugal lifestyle, no serious data backing up the claim other than “YOLO”. The fact that he could conceivably and potentially have access to certain goods or services that other people didn’t have access too, and an assumption from Forbes that he did access them and “died a multi-millionaire”, tells us more about Forbes and the writer than about Fidel.