Link:

  1. lemmy.world/c/sponsorblock
  2. !sponsorblock@lemmy.world

SponsorBlock is an open-source crowdsourced browser extension and open API for skipping sponsor segments in YouTube videos. Users submit when a sponsor happens from the extension, and the extension automatically skips sponsors it knows about using a privacy preserving query system. It also supports skipping other categories, such as intros, outros and reminders to subscribe, and skipping to the point with highlight.

The source code is fully open and the database can be downloaded by anyone. I want to keep this as open as possible! You can view the docs for the public API or host a mirror.

  • dwindling7373
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    My brother in Christ, being watched is the goal of any content creator, that’s unrelated to advertisements. Now Youtube ads are paid (lets simplify a bit) blindly once you click the video, it’s a metric, you see those if you want access to the video.

    If the content of the video has the guy saying “thanks xyz for sponsoring this raid shadow legends” that’s a contract between the guy doing the video and the sponsor, following metrics agreed between themselves, it has no ties with “the purpose of youtube” simply because… it’s not youtube.

    Will there be people doing cheap content to get “easy” sponsor money? Sure but if the content suck you won’t watch it. It’s a loss just like if the motetization was following any other driver (as long as the driver is… watching the thing rather than not).

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      it has no ties with “the purpose of youtube” simply because… it’s not youtube.

      It’s literally hosted and watched on YT my guy. Without YT the video would not exist, without YT the video would not be watched, without YT the video would not even get created, and without YT it would not give the creator any way to monetize it - be it through YT ads itself or through external third party sponsoring, which is ultimately completely irrelevant to your counter argument. In the end the videos get made with the purpose of making money off of them, not to provide a potentially interesting video to be shared with others - that’s how YT started.

      Sure but if the content suck you won’t watch it.

      I won’t, thousands or even millions of others do though, because the average user is about as brain dead as the content nowadays on YT.

      • dwindling7373
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        You have a problem with profits, mate, not with ads.

        I’m not disagreeing with you there, but also, I like the things I like to exist without waiting for the revolution.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I have a problem with content made for the purpose to profit. And no, I’m completely allergic to ads, so I very much have a problem with ads as a whole too. They’re just two correlating issues.