• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s OK, that was only the car phone book. The phone book everyone kept in the car. Which was a perfectly normal thing everyone did.

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This was a unique point in time when people had cell phones but had to carry a phonebook because there was no mobile internet. Some time between 1992 and 2005?

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even once mobile internet was introduced, it was really expensive and many businesses didn’t have a web presence that would work on mobile. It’s only since maybe 2011 that someone could look up a business on their phone and be relatively confident that they’d find contact info on a mobile friendly page and not blow out their monthly data allowance in the process.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even in 2005, mobile internet was so shit, it might as well not have existed. 2007-2008 was when 3G was starting to get rolled out I believe, but even that was pretty damn slow and expensive. 3.5G in ~2010+ is when things were usable enough that you could perform a Google search without giving up before the your first result loads.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In the UK at least, mobile phone ownership per household was only 16% in 1996 and didn’t reach 50% until the year 2000.

      To have a phone in '92 you’d need to either be wealthy or have it through a company for business.

      My dad had a phone in 95 for work and it was an absolute brick.

      As for mobile internet, that wasn’t really a thing until smartphones happened with the iPhone. Yes we had WAP and other precursors to the full internet but it was awful and nobody used it, ever. In 2007 I was a geeky nerd at uni doing Comp Sci and had a Windows Mobile PDA in a belt holster, with full internet! But most people didn’t have Internet until about 2009-10

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you mean the Cisco iPhone from the 90s or the Brazilian iphone from the early '00s? I’m totally just taking the piss though, I know you mean the Apple one from the later '00s but it wasn’t that rare to have mobile internet before it, they were just riding the wave that was already breaking across society.

        Apple had a major advantage though, lots of people were already eyeing their popular mp3 player, if a phone could be a phone, internet, and a good music player you can sync easily, it won for a lot of people. I couldn’t justify the price and really liked physical keyboards, by the time those became rare I disliked Apple too much to try them.

        Somewhere I have my old BB 8320 from 2007, it was awesome because it had WiFi so much better speed when WiFi was available.

        • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m with the op on this one, I had just about every device under the sun, but mobile internet wasn’t a thing in Australia until we had a proper mobile browser, and that was with the iPhone. I vividly remember whipping out my 3gs to browse the internet, people being amazed, but it also being absolute shit if you were on the move or in most places. I would say ubiquitous reliable mobile internet wasn’t a thing until maybe 2012-13

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was a post-doc during this period. I had a mobile phone but data was eyebleedingly expensive, and there wasn’t much to do on mobile. Most companies had a minimal web presence and very little directed towards mobile. I drove across the US in 2009 and even then it was better to use the information preloaded on my Garmin than the mobile web.

          • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I remember it being iffy when I used it back then, the 8320 didn’t have GPS so it was trying to use cell towers to figure out the turn by turn. It was slower, but not as slow as the connection speed would seem because every page load wasn’t dependent on a thousand different CDNs and a hundred different trackers.

            A dedicated GPS was essential for cross country (if you didn’t want paper maps or printouts).

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The T-Mobile Sidekick had a full browser in 2002 and was wildly popular with younger people.

        A large part of DangerOS’s architecture was later used to create Android.

      • espentan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I first bought a phone as soon as the first GSM networks opened, in Norway, in 1993. My first phone was a Pioneer PCC-D700 and, if memory serves, it cost 2995 NOK / ~300 EUR.

        Before GSM became a thing, phones were crazy expensive, though. Almost as expensive as an iPhone, he.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I remember in 2005, pulling over and calling my sister for directions on my flip phone because I got lost.

      I didn’t get mobile internet until like 2010. Not because I couldn’t, but because it was wildly expensive for a bad experience, since “mobile-friendly” was non-existent.

      This was also during the era when Google Maps was a brand new website, not a app. I think I was still MapQuesting.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        since “mobile-friendly” was non-existent.

        And now everything is mobile-first.

        WIsh we could go back to the time where mobile-friendly was a thing, but using a desktop browser was a valid option too.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          What sites are you having issues with on a desktop? I find pretty much everything is desktop first, and most are mobile-friendly. But maybe it’s the sites we visit.

          • FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Every website that’s mainly for displaying text (think into pages, blogs, Q&A) assumes your browser window is portrait like a phone screen. If I have widened my window I want the text to reach the edges, not float in a central column with masses of useless whitespace either side.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              That has nothing to do with phones and everything to do with readability. It turns out, people have trouble reading overly long lines of text, so website developers tend to limit text to a certain width. It’s also a little bit of carryover to pre-responsive design when websites had to work well on 800x600 desktop screens, as well as 1080p screens, but that hasn’t really been a thing for many years now.

              I like the second answer here:

              I agree with the user Jared Farrish: it’s to make the content more readable. If a paragraph spans the entire width of the browser window, it can be taxing on the eye to move from the end of one line to the start of the next line if the paragraph takes up many pixels in width. Many websites tend to limit the width of the page for this reason. In addition, some Web sites use media queries to change the font size if the user’s browser window width is very large.

              • FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well I disagree, because I find having to scroll up and down more often makes it less readable, and if I wanted it to be thin I’d make the browser window thin. Return to 90s websites where the site just gives you the info and how to display it is left entirely to the browser and the user.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remember paying a ton because I enabled mobile data in 2009 to check the score on a football game. My normal bill was ~$50/month for unlimited talk/text, and a few megs of data to check the score on one game doubled my bill that month.

        It wasn’t until 2011/2012 until I had a plan w/ data, and even then it was kind of expensive and slow. I remember switching to Google Fi pretty early on because it was only $10/GB, which was a really good deal at the time.

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Around that time I was a swamper on a moving truck, we had been just using a map book, worked fine. The owner decided TomTom was the future, and wanted us using it, no arguments!
        We’re going down the highway, fully loaded, probably going a bit faster than we should, and TomTom, in it’s infinite wisdom, yells “Sharp left here!” This is Canada, and we were halfway between exits, a sharp left turn would have put us through the concrete barriers and into oncoming traffic. Needless to say, we turned Tom off, and carried on with the map book…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        There was also goog411 from 2007 to 2010. It was nice for finding phone numbers quickly and for free, but in hindsight, they were collecting vocal data.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      later than 2005 for most people, the first iPhone was released in 2007, first Android phone in 2008, those things made a lot more people practically able to access the Internet from outside, and even then it took until 2009 to 2011 for many people to get one

      • deltapi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My Father had a ‘car phone’ from 1990-1999ish and then switched to a nokia 3210 or similar. While he had the ‘car phone’, he kept a phone book in the car. By the time of the Nokia, his outbound calling was predictable enough that he either had it saved on the phone or he used ‘411’ to have an operator look up the number.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think I’ve ever called 411, or known anyone who has. I have known about it for ages, but I guess I was always under the impression that it was expensive or something.

    • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just like how it punches. But I acknowledge it’s been used by horrible people in the past and I just don’t wanna say it since it reminds me of Hans Asperger and American eugenics society every time I hear it

        • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, Hans Asperger was a nazi. His clinic is responsible for murdering hundereds of autistic children. Wikipedia

          Also asperger’s has been merged into the autism spectrum in DSM 5 due to it being nearly the same as autism but functional

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      For me, which I dont use it outside of discord, it means people with a perfectly functioning brain who chose ignorance. They choose to believe that all.over the nation schools are putting litter boxes out for furry kids or some stupid ass, easily disprovable, GQP bullshit.