• Moonrise2473
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The main advantage of using custom silicon is that you can decide the naming and so you deceive users that the minor 0.1 update is a full generation advance

    Kinda like I saw someone saying “apple skipped A17 for the iPhone 16 and gave the faster A18” - they’re in charge of the naming and they can easily decide that A18 = A17

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is not true. A17 pro is an existing chip that is slower than the A18. It wouldn’t make sense to call A18 A17 instead

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is that noteworthy though? As in, it’s a 3D check, and most mobile games have graphics that an old TI 92 could render.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the real world with real people, what matters is efficiency. Top performance that you can only achieve in benchmarks is not any indicative of efficiency.

      • JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Shouldn’t we compare this to SD Gen 3 tho? Why are we comparing with SD Gen 1 from 2023?

        Or is the merit here more focused on power consumption? That Tensor G4 has one of the lowest power consumption?

        • limerod@reddthat.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          8 gen 1 was a 2022 chipset. The reason it’s not being compared to 8 gen 3 is because its not in the same league as the latest 8 gen Snapdragon.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          We’re comparing it to gen 1 to emphasize how far it is from being competitive.

          Not really new; this has been the case with all the Tensor chips. I kind of assumed Google was going to step up their game at some point, but I don’t think Samsung can produce chips on par with TSMC. Google is switching to TSMC for next year’s Tensor 5, so maybe we’ll see a big jump then.

          That said, I don’t think it’s a deal-breaker. I’m running a Pixel 7 and it’s “fine”. The Pixel 6 had bad throttling/overheating problems, but the 7 and 8 are better. We’ll see what the Big Problem is with the 9 series. There’s always something.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t care about any game stats for my phone but it is annoying that my P9P XL lags when it’s connected to AA and I want to grab it fast, double click the power button to open the camera and snap a quick picture.

    I’ve experienced the same lag with previous Pixels. Assumed it was a RAM issue and maybe it is, but it’s annoying nonetheless.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish Google would just switch back to Qualcomm but keep Titan security chip. Best of both worlds now that Qualcomm has decent NPU onboard.