It’s very easy to see how he can be a founder of the ACP. They’re LaRouchites. The whole thing is mixing western chauvinism with entryism and culty leadership. He hates PSL because they’re what Marxist-Leninists actually look like. He’s a grifter trying to become a communism guru to trick baby lefties into being right-wingers in his personal retinue.
I’d say their pseudo-ideology is more primarily based on nazbol duginism with American characteristics with internal factions composed of said crypto-fascist duginists, post-cpi larouchites, petite bourgeois social chauvinists, and a few feds working on trying to bait the dipshits into entrapping themselves.
The entire thing is a series of literal petite bourgeois social media based personality cults scammers coming together to create a cash pool to parasite off of for as long as they can either milk it or can tolerate each other.
They went for the most obnoxious combination of influences and didn’t even bother to be Posadists just to make it fun. CPUSA’s embarrassing flagfucking makes it in but they won’t even cite Fourier and tell me what species of cuckold their enemies are.
When Black Hammer was doing this, they at least made it fun. I never doubted their next little thing would be silly. Hinkle and Haz present themselves with such religious seriousness and it’s just indistinguishable from Nicholas Fuentes to me.
Hmm, I see. I try not to come down to hard on them since I’m sure some of their members are actual Marxist-Leninists, but the leadership makes me wary, not that it effects me since I’m not American.
The very few that may be actual communists are severely misguided in the same way the handful of German communists who joined the NSDAP.
If they can’t figure out why they’re experiencing the Maillard reaction and slowly growing a brown shell around their red form, then there is structurally no difference between them and their reactionary counterparts.
What is up with this guy? Is he a grifter? Because I don’t understand how he can be one of the founding members of the ACP…
It’s very easy to see how he can be a founder of the ACP. They’re LaRouchites. The whole thing is mixing western chauvinism with entryism and culty leadership. He hates PSL because they’re what Marxist-Leninists actually look like. He’s a grifter trying to become a communism guru to trick baby lefties into being right-wingers in his personal retinue.
I’d say their pseudo-ideology is more primarily based on nazbol duginism with American characteristics with internal factions composed of said crypto-fascist duginists, post-cpi larouchites, petite bourgeois social chauvinists, and a few feds working on trying to bait the dipshits into entrapping themselves.
The entire thing is a series of literal petite bourgeois social media based personality cults scammers coming together to create a cash pool to parasite off of for as long as they can either milk it or can tolerate each other.
There LaRouchites combined with Browderism and Duginism which is literally Nazbol with Eurasianism
They went for the most obnoxious combination of influences and didn’t even bother to be Posadists just to make it fun. CPUSA’s embarrassing flagfucking makes it in but they won’t even cite Fourier and tell me what species of cuckold their enemies are.
When Black Hammer was doing this, they at least made it fun. I never doubted their next little thing would be silly. Hinkle and Haz present themselves with such religious seriousness and it’s just indistinguishable from Nicholas Fuentes to me.
Too many -isms, just call them confused opportunistic idiots.
Holy shit they’re trying to do Hyperborea but in real life
Hmm, I see. I try not to come down to hard on them since I’m sure some of their members are actual Marxist-Leninists, but the leadership makes me wary, not that it effects me since I’m not American.
The very few that may be actual communists are severely misguided in the same way the handful of German communists who joined the NSDAP.
If they can’t figure out why they’re experiencing the Maillard reaction and slowly growing a brown shell around their red form, then there is structurally no difference between them and their reactionary counterparts.