• egonallanon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I say we bring back barrel Jacks for all devices. None of this transferring data and power nonsense.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The problem is that without any data line, you can’t negotiate voltage, which makes a single standard for all devices difficult.

          • Damage
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Tbf you can relatively easily transmit power and data on the same conductor

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve seen a few comments on the BBC suggesting that this will stifle innovation because “a better cable could be designed”, but given USB-C supports alt modes, this seems like a daft argument to me.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean, you’re right about the delusion thing, but isn’t this law just attempting to piggyback off of the EU chargers law ?

      Edit: I misread that title. I thought it was something like “UK to consider USB-C charging standard law”. Yeah if they are seriously considering anything other than USB-C they are delusional

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago
        and if this needs to be the same as the USB-C connector the EU adopted.
        

        The consideration should be quick, “Should we use a different charging standard that the EU ? No”

        If not they are seriously delusional