They can’t sell the $699 AI party trick that requires a $24 subscription so they slashed the price to $499. Unfortunately it’s still $500 too expensive for what’s worth.

Maybe at $10 someone could buy it as a Halloween costume prop and even pay a whole month of subscription just to show off the novelty

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    28 days ago

    At what price point would this device be useful? Seems like the sort of device that was made to allow the company to be bought by Google/Microsoft/Meta.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      28 days ago

      At what price point would this device be useful?

      given that it’s horribly bad at what it claims to do and was a fire risk? not even a zero point.

        • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yeah that’d be cool if the opened it up and recreate it as a platform for people to mess around with it. Like a rPi or Arduino or something. Because in it’s current form…pretty much useless. But you’re right; they’d have to drop that price point significantly and incentivize people even if it were open.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’ll probably be a brick in a few months, when the company goes bankrupt and the servers it relies on get shut down. So even getting it for free would be too expensive.

  • DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    28 days ago

    Bit late, isn’t it? I had already forgotten all about it and I don’t think I’m the only one.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      28 days ago

      If it was free and I just had to pay the subscription I’d think “Can’t my phone already do all this?”

      • Moonrise2473OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        28 days ago

        You phone doesn’t have the low-res laser projector gimmick that is invisible in daylight, runs extremely hot and drains the battery in one hour

        • 4grams@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          truth be told, the only reason I would be even remotely interested in the device is the stupid laser projector. Seems like that might be fun to play with.

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            Yes! I remember experiments with similar projectors and interfaces like this device going back at least as far as the early 2010s. Would be fun to mess with.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    28 days ago

    Maybe if they make a watch with a camera cover and a laser that draws a little box around what it can see and it all runs locally, then I might be interested.

    Mainly to identify plants and mushrooms.

    Not a fan of the idea of everyone pointing AI powered cameras at me all the time, like with this weird pin or smart glasses.

    Such products should have a legally mandated camera cover, microphone shutoff and a REALLY OBVIOUS tell to everyone around you if you are using the camera or mic.

    Bonus points if it screams a really loud “PERVERT” alarm if you’re doing something creepy.

    If only that was true for smartphones too…

    • LukeZaz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      28 days ago

      Mainly to identify plants and mushrooms.

      Considering modern-day “AI” track records at this, the only thing I’d trust a device like that to do is massively increase poisoning deaths.