• The Soviet Reporter@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I meant that saying “Leninism” includes Marxism the same way Mao Zedong Thought includes Leninism. Therefore, just saying “Leninism” would suffice without having to include “Marxism”.

    • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Are you insisting on that? lol

      Marxism is not complete without Lenin. Period.

      Yes, Lenin’s contributions are in the Marxist camp. But they are so important that some people who care about revolution realized he is not merely a complement, Lenin’s works are an essential part of Marxism. If you want to remove that label from yourself and call yourself a red cuddly bear, go ahead. But Marxism-Leninism is clear about the origins of the theoretical basis of a person or organization, while “Marxist” alone is not that much. Many “respectable” academics who are absolutely alienated from the actual problems of working class, organization and revolution, call themselves Marxist. But I never saw a “Marxist-Leninist” academic.

      This is the political line that separates the scholastic from the revolutionary. So it’s not a small thing, and not simply a label you call yourself.

      • The Soviet Reporter@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        You misunderstood what I meant. I meant that there are non-Leninists Marxists, but that all Leninists are Marxists; therefore, saying “Marxist-Leninist” seems redundant.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Yes, we heard you: you think it sounds redundant. You’ve said your piece, repeatedly. Feel free to think that. But that’s still what we call it, and we’re not going to change what we call ourselves because you think it sounds redundant. It’s like you’re looking for the most poindexter, praxisless hill to die on.