• Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    This will not move the needle. Conservatives don’t give a teeny tiny fuck about animals. They kill animals for entertainment and brag about how heartless they are in the process.

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      They absolutely care about the enslavement of innocent woodland creatures for human entertainment and monetary profit. These people complain there are no elephants at the circus being beat anymore.

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Now hold on. The MAGA-types may hold nothing holy, but the older conservatives did give something of a shit about animals. Nixon did give us the EPA, after all.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Nixon did not create the EPA out of benevolence. The normal (non-conservative and progressive) reps had been pushing for it for years and were gaining public opinion momentum on it. Nixon knew if he was able to create it on his own terms, it could be controlled and hamstrung. He did exactly that.

        Nixon allowed conservatives and the business-class (both of whom hated the EPA) to determine how the EPA would be limited. And every conservative administration since Nixon has done the same thing, using the EPA as a tool to allow corporations to do exactly as they please while telling the public that the environment is being protected.

        Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation, and the EPA is an excellent example of that truism in action.

    • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Nailed it right there. They care more about this one squirrel than the women who die from pregnancies gone wrong because doctors can’t treat them without opening themselves up to legal problems, the Haitians and Puerto Ricans who find themselves threatened and ostracized because of Trump and Vance’s words, etc.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    The animal that was killed by the police state using excessive force? Is Trump pro defunding the police now?

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        That was great info you gave.

        Even if it had rabies at the time, seems seems like excessive force to treat the guy like a drug dealer or like it was the gator incident at the bottom of the article. Also not sure how Harris/Trump has any impact on this.

    • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      I made this exact argument. All of the sudden they’re against excessive police raids. Maybe they’ll agree that if police are using this much manpower for squirrels they may be over funded and a correction could be in order. One could argue for some sort of defunding to get police priorities back in order.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    11 days ago

    Maybe get some of those permits for your animals before you get them killed through negligence. Dont play chicken with the State. Dont vote for Donald Trump.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Killing an animal because their owner didn’t have their papers is ridiculas. The animal shouldn’t be punished because the owner was a dumbass.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        They didn’t kill him because he didn’t have a permit. They killed him because they couldn’t verify the squirrel’s health, due to the owner forgoing vet treatment and documentation, because he didn’t have a permit for the squirrel

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nearly as fucked up as making viral videos with an animal and never bothering to make sure its legal before you exploit it.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 days ago

            Dude used the squirrel to make viral videos, now that his money stream is gone because he never bothered to get permits for the poor squirrel he’s blaming the state of New York. The raid wouldnt have happened if he got permits and if some other Rubepublican in Texas wasn’t screeching about him not having it. This is one massive Ruth Goldberg footgun and the only victim here are the rescue animals he kept as pets.

            • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              not to mention the squirrel got injured to the point it’s bone was sticking out of its tail and the guy didn’t take it to the vet because they wouldn’t let him keep it as a pet.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                10 days ago

                When everyone else leaves out essential details…

                They knew it they needed a license, they knew it needed care, but they didn’t take care of it or make any effort to make it legal because…they didn’t want to lose their upload momentum?

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              In 14 states it’s totally legal. Also, not a single case of rabies in the US has ever come from a squirrel. They can be a pet as much as a rat can be a pet and those are allowed in pretty much any state.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              Squirrels are just bushy tailed tree rats, rats are not prohibited or require permits in any state. The law is idiotic and killing an animal because the owner didn’t have papers is idiotic and spiteful.

              • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                The animal wasn’t killed because the owner didn’t have papers. The animal was killed because it was on video several times biting it’s owner, and you cannot test for rabies without killing the animal and examining its brain.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Rabies kills animals in about 10 days. We have years of videos… It didn’t have rabies. Since lived indoors you can also reasonably prove that it couldn’t get rabies either.