Not_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agoThe blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down115
arrow-up1526arrow-down1imageThe blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netNot_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 hour agoThat’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoYes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.
minus-squareᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoHuh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·60 minutes agoRight is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain. Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense. If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
minus-squareᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·55 minutes ago Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain. You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained? you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense. Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing. Lol
That’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.
Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.
Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.
If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?
Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense
Lol