Feddit.it
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 6 months ago

What could go wrong?

lemmy.world

message-square
59
link
fedilink
554

What could go wrong?

lemmy.world

The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 6 months ago
message-square
59
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Fewer parts = fewer parts that can fail.

    Boeing should look into this.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Too bad they’re not having problems when the interior parts fail.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Probably because Boeing don’t make the seats.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      #ElonTakes

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Weight repartition and balance is extremely important in an aircraft. If everyone moved to one end of the aircraft it could cause loss of control and crash

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      6 months ago

      Skill issue. Pilots need to learn to think on their feet.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why can’t they stay sitting?

        • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 months ago

          Their seats weren’t installed either

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Then they can’t see over the console. Surely you noticed there aren’t any seats, right?

    • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      DO A BARREL ROLL!

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Simple solution is to pack enough people in that they can’t move like that

      • RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ya, maybe like on seats with, dunno, belts?

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sounds space inefficient just add more people instead

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Can confirm, seats are big and heavy, that’s valuable people space.

            Also, remove the luggage storage for more people weight capacity.

          • faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean, it’s possible to have around 1100 people in a B747, so yeah that checks out

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s quite scary to think that you can crash an airplane by having everyone walk to one end

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • Chaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh no! Tsa will be taking away our trainers next.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is how we, the people, shall regain power from those pilots who think they know everything!!!

    • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      a change in weight distribution is cited as one of the reasons for the crash of this us cargo flight in afghanistan.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Pushkin_Tu-104_crash happens more often than people know.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    They should fly up as high as possible and take a nose dive, then repeat the process. Let’s call it Floating Xperience.

    • SGforce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s Boeing, they do that anyway.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not the repeating part

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s part of astronaut training, they call it the vomit comet.

      • 5715@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Vomiting in the cockpit sounds a bit difficult to deal with after.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Vomit Comet exists.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s basically what parabolic flights for simulating low or no gravity are.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    How about just bunk beds with seat belts or some kind of restraint and a paddled ceiling inside your bed space.

    The next dumb thing to having an completely open floor space is in installing seats and normalizing the idea that people should sit in them for 8, 10, 12, 14 hours periods.

    The only time we need seats with restraints is in the ten minutes after take off and the ten minutes when landing … the rest of the time, I would prefer if I just slept the entire time.

    I’d give up TV, a monitor, music, a window, free food and drinks if airlines just gave me a bare bones option of just being allowed to sleep flat for the entire flight.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s a thing already and it is called first class.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Could never afford it … my point was … I’d pay regular fare to be able to lie flat for the entire flight and you can forget giving me a TV monitor, entertainment, free food, just give me water, don’t even bother with a blanket or pillow … you can even stack me with three or four other bunks above or below me … I don’t even want a window … I don’t want to interact with your staff and I really don’t want to have anything to do with anyone or bother with anyone for the entire flight … just let me sleep in peace for eight hours, it’s cheap and I really don’t care or want any extras.

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        And you still get all the other stuff, so the only thing you have to give up is a lot of money

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      They have that on routes to Floston Paradise.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I unironically think this is how plane travel should be. Slide me into a tube and gas me asleep. No peanuts, no crick neck, no risk of hijacking, and no praying and screaming when we slam into a mountain at 900km/h because the pilots had a bad day.

        • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It may be longer than you think.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are several ways they could do stacked beds or offset-stacked reclined seats that would not only be more comfortable and provide more room for the passengers, but also allow them to cram more people in the plane.

    • Aeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel like you could make a laying-down seatbelt (if it crashes, we’re fucked anyway) and I should definitely be able to lay down proper.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    Then everyone decides to look out the left windows at the grand canyon.

    And then slowly shifts to the back of the plane because they want to see it longer.

    Soon they’ll see it up close.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just install two layers of beds with seatbelts, imo.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I want hammocks like a man o’ war.

    Stack em three high and still have some legroom.

  • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Damn that would be dope if it was stable enough. So Star Trek. Just needs a bar run by Whoopi Goldberg

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      If your vessel’s bartender has eyebrows and doesn’t wear a cool hat, something has gone wrong.

      • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No cool hat, but is a Space Station a vessel? 🤔

    • Damage
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, very Enterprise-D

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    That interior instantly made me think of lazy town

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Cooking by the Book: A Lil Bigger Mix

      • veroxii@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Knew what it was before I even clicked. You sir are an internet historian.

  • Ifeelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/may/01/747-cargo-plane-crash-bagram-airbase-video

    I know this is a shitpost, but in case anyone is curious this link has a video of what can happen if a plane has unsecured weight onboard that is allowed to move around.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      And here’s the Wikipedia page about the incident, which has more details:

      On 29 April 2013, the Boeing 747-400 operating the flight crashed within the perimeter of the Bagram airfield moments after taking off, killing all seven people on board.

      The subsequent investigation concluded that improperly secured cargo broke free during the take-off and rolled to the back of the cargo hold, crashing through the rear pressure bulkhead and disabling the rear flight control systems. This rendered the aircraft stuck in an uncontrollable pitch-up attitude and induced a stall, and made recovery by the pilots impossible.

      So it’s not just unsecured cargo, but unsecured cargo that disabled rear flight control systems. I’m guessing unsecured people wouldn’t cause the same problem, but it could certainly cause other problems.

      • veroxii@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah people are squishier than the fuselage.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    ohhhh so that’s where the set designers of all the star trek interiors got their ideas

    • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nah, Star Trek is where Boeing is shopping for ideas.

  • Sergio@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Line dance during take-off: “now sliiiiide to the back!”

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Na you can only do that in an airbus

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    They could at least set up a kid corral somewhere, let the little shots wear themselves out.

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Just eject them at maximum altitude

      Abortion isn’t legal but human rights violations aren’t really being punished right now

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And depending on where you’re going, it would likely happen in international airspace.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think this is actually a demo setup by boeing - there are track systems that the seat rows anchor into on actual aircraft, and those tracks are flush with the carpet.

People Twitter@sh.itjust.works

whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 962 users / day
  • 5.16K users / week
  • 9.05K users / month
  • 19.3K users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 6.94K subscribers
  • 1.15K Posts
  • 42.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org