• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    How are people going to be selected for deportation? This feels eerily like what Hitler started doing with Jews.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Drive through rural America and see how many underpopulated small towns there are. Shuttered businesses for lack of customers. Abandoned buildings. These places need people.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s kind of wild to me how many really small towns there are in the US. About 32% of towns in the U.S. have less than 500 residents.

      For comparison, here in Brazil I lived most of my life in a town with ~35K residents and it was already considered a small rural town. Some of my family lives in a neighboring town with ~11K residents, and even in my hometown people joke about how small it is, and that there’s basically nothing going on there. 1288 of towns in Brazil have less than 5K residents, or about 23.1%, and there are no towns with less than 500 residents. Meanwhile in the US 76% of towns have less than 5K residents.

      Again, it’s just kind of wild to me. I remember playing (reading?) the Echo VN and thinking “Man, a dying town with only 50 people? That doesn’t sound realistic,” but apparently that’s way more common than I thought.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My slightly educated guess would be that’s a consequence of America’s race westward in the 1800’s, only stopping long enough to annihilate the indigenous population and set up a rest stop for the next batch.

      • WordBox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We also have “towns” that are insufficient in size and unlisted or are under another towns “address”. A town near me has less than 1000 people and that includes the towns under it that are 3-5mi apart.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This move actually makes zero fucking sense. Having people in our country who are willing to work less money than the average citizen labor costs are low. That basically means more money for him and his oligarch buddies.

    He’s already won the election. He doesn’t have to keep posturing like this. And he’s not going to be elected again, so either he (hopefully) has no third term, or he’ll prevent the 2028 elections from being free and fair.

    My prediction is that nothing will actually come of this and he’s saying this to keep his approval rating high.

    Either that or he’s even more racist than he is greedy and self-centered

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He’s already won the election. He doesn’t have to keep posturing like this.

      That was never his end goal, and you’re naive to think otherwise.

      As for the rest, you’re missing a key step - to get them all “deported”, first they need to be rounded up, and put in camps (we already past this point a while back), and then since they’re already in camps, they might as well be put to work. For free (another point we’ve past). When they start dying off in big enough numbers for it to affect production, there will be another group marked for “deportation” and rounded up for their turn.

      This isn’t fascism’s first fucking rodeo, and it isn’t only now getting started, it has been in motion for a good while now.

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Actually serves pretty well if one’s goal were to further destabilise things. People have already been convinced that illegal immigrants are to blame for all economic problems (even though it is easier to prove the extreme opposite through a cursory search on the internet), maybe if the downward slope is gentle enough, people won’t start doubting the efficacy of the initially applied solution. Maybe the point was to get them to the next level, get them angry at something else after everything is done with the false problem.

      I just don’t see Trump actually wanting what’s his version of “best” for the country. I think he’s on a power play, and the country’s just the kindling.

      Maybe I’m talking complete nonsense, but this feels like a… logical escalation. To what, I cannot fathom, although we’ve seen similar movements preclude Totalitarian/Authoritarian regime solidification periods before, where the desperate masses clung to the wrong solution.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I just want to point out that declaring a state of emergency to “deal with” illegal immigrants will allow the construction of large camps all over the country where undesirables can be ‘concentrated’ for ‘processing’.

        After rounding up illegal immigrants, maybe they’ll invalidate the status of legal immigrants that knowingly employed, illegal immigrants. Or housed illegal immigrants. Or defended illegal immigrants. Of course these people will need to be detained in the same camps while it all gets processed.

        The condition of the camps won’t be great, maybe the detainees can work in specially approved facilities while immigration status gets processed, this will help alleviate the cost of camp maintenance and improve living conditions.

        Maybe the detainees can be rented out to local plantations to subsidize the cost of feeding them.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yeah, we definitely need less people in this country. I’m sure it’ll help fill all the job vacancies and increase productivity and GDP.

    I will make sure to bring this up when any republicans complain that are so many vacancies because no one wants to work anymore.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Strictly speaking of productivity without justifying Trump’s plan in any way - labor shortage increases productivity. Cheap labor decreases productivity. Expensive labor forces capitalists to invest in new equipment and training to be able to produce the same output with fewer labor hours. Simple example - fastening the same number of bolts using manual screwdrivers in more hands vs electric screwdrivers in fewer hands.

      Outside of that, removing a significant portion of the population at any one time would be significantly disruptive in many regards.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lebensraum.

      It doesn’t need to be a real problem, for them to make it one.

      The immigrant work force will still be there, they’ll just be put in camps and forced to work for nothing, while white working class people are sold the idea of “claiming back” “their” land, while the capitalists take it all over in their name (and never share any of the profits or benefits, of course, with a new scapegoat as for why as they need it).

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      For whom? The people being deported? Or for the overall effectiveness of the plan?

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure there was a damaging mass deportation during the Great Depression that deported mostly american citizens to Mexico.

            • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Maybe that’s his plan. He doesn’t like the prenup and wants to marry that ghoul Loomer so he’s doing this to get her deported and the marriage annulled. Then he’ll use government money to put on a huge wedding and try to have a baby immediately. Everyone knows if you’re president when you have a kid the government is on the hook for support. Unlimited money!!!

              It’s 12-D chess!!!1!

                • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Spoken like a person who doesn’t even know how to get their kid unlimited money. You’re just mad that you can’t marry that perfect ball of plastic surgery and hatred.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Correct, in the 1930s, I saw someone post about it recently. I don’t know the motivation then, but the tactic will be used this time to target any group. Maybe even used for “other activities” when deportation becomes logistically difficult.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I feel like to the people doing the deporting this time, they wouldn’t care. The point is to be damaging.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Both.

        The Wilson/Coolidge Era was nightmarish for immigrants, with a host of laws targeting East Asian migrants and displacing uncountable numbers of industrial workers particularly along the West Coast.

        Eisenhower’s Operation Wetback set off a wave of police terror along the Gulf Coast, crippled the agricultural economy, and killed hundreds of migrants forced into transit.

        The current border policy funnels hundreds of thousands of migrants through an inhospitality Texas/Arizona desert region that’s killed around 10k-50k people in the last decade.

        None of it actually curbs immigration. It all just becomes a black market affair, affording employers a tool to depress wages and cartels an opportunity to press-gang border residents into cattle slavery.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m third generation, but I’d like to be deported, please. Where do i sign up?

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The whole toilet seat thing is as misunderstood. If the Air force needs a new toilet seat for one of it’s jets, and that jet isn’t in production anymore, and you can’t just go to homedepot for aircraft parts, then you have to order a bespoke seat.

      Now setting up the tooling for an injection molded plastic seat, only to produce a limited run, maybe in the dozens, $10,000 per seat is a reasonable price.

      I’m sure the Pentagon buys toilet seats at the regular price. The interesting thing about Pentagon bathrooms is that it has double the number it needs because of segregation.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There also the fact that the government has to buy domestic as much as possible. Not to say they don’t use corruption to transfer wealth via those contracts.