• Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    What is this, the rated-PG version? The classic punchline is “but I would never guillotine the janitor”.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    CEOs are hired by owners/investors for the explicit purpose of maximizing profits. If the CEO were instead, for instance, elected by the workers, or hired by a community cooperative, I think opinions of CEOs would be much higher.

    In other words: it’s not the CEO, it’s the system.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If a CEO was elected by thr employees it would be like any other elected official, where it can swing widely from being excellent to awful because large numbers of people are not great at selecting quality leadership. Now a system where an employee elected board selects the CEO and the employees have the power to remove the CEO, that could be pretty solid.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        The problem seems to be getting large numbers of people to agree on things. My solution is to simply not have large numbers of people.

        • Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          The problem seems to be getting large numbers of people to agree on things. My solution is to simply not have large numbers of people.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          This but unironically

          People are too short sighted and plainly put, fucking stupid, to govern themselves. That’s why democracy is kind of an inherently unstable system until one group manages to consolidate enough power to ignore the others

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Deciding on a restaurant with a few people is easy. Deciding on a restaurant with a few dozen people is fucking impossible.

            Humans were not meant to live in societies of more than 150 people. Our brains can’t comprehend a nation of millions, just like we can’t comprehend the vastness of space.

  • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Same here! The janitor is such a badass, he keeps the whole building ruining and is always around.

    The CEO sens like a nice guy, but everytime he’s around, it feels like he’s just trying to get people to wave at him.