Clbull@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 day agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down180
arrow-up1-29arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldClbull@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 day agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up41arrow-down2·edit-21 day agoSure keep telling yourself that you enjoy all the ads, malware, garbage UI and UX, bloated size, cost, etc Nobody has fun using windows, they just tolerate it.
minus-squarearisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoi’m with you on everything else, but i don’t know if linux desktop as a whole is a shining example of good UX/UI, oof…
minus-square737@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-210 hours agowhats “linux desktop”? plasma certainly has better ux/ui than windows gnome definitely does too cinnamon may be debatable tiling window managers are in my view unrivaled in ux compared to anything else gtk3 and qt also offer extensive theming on posix compliant systems proper terminal centric design is also very important to me, making windows as a whole an unbearable user experience
minus-square737@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoi mean vanilla gnome 47 and plasma 6.1, not whatever ubuntu does
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agoYeah your expererience can vary a lot depending on what you use or start out with as a new user.
Sure keep telling yourself that you enjoy all the ads, malware, garbage UI and UX, bloated size, cost, etc
Nobody has fun using windows, they just tolerate it.
i’m with you on everything else, but i don’t know if linux desktop as a whole is a shining example of good UX/UI, oof…
whats “linux desktop”?
i mean vanilla gnome 47 and plasma 6.1, not whatever ubuntu does
Yeah your expererience can vary a lot depending on what you use or start out with as a new user.