• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    Programs can already be refused from being able to view screen contents. If malware is able to circumvent this, why do you believe it would abide by the filtering rules? Further, if you really do believe this is useful, Microsoft could implement this technology without also randomly screenshotting your computer.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      If a malware bypasses a function directly, then closing that loophole would force future versions to find more complicated ways of achieving the same thing, which makes them more visible in the long run.

      Edit: Also, Microsoft sucks. But now that the ugly crap is out there, you’ll come to face it eventually. Why not be more prepared?

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        What are you even talking about? Where have the goal posts gone? You wanna know what else sounds like malware? A program randomly and persistently taking screenshots of my computer and sending it to someone.

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          My goalpost never moved. Technically, the feature can be improved.