Perhaps the 84 second burn overflowed the integer (2^6) and was caught by a 2^7s check (127s)

  • IWriteDaCode@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    The tweet you link didn’t indicate that. It said that an engine failure likely caused the overrun, running for 127 seconds instead of the planned 84. Why would something have a 2^7 int size check?

    Edit: Quoted

    The head of Roscosmos Yuri Borisov said that the main cause of the #Luna25 crash was an engine failure. Instead of the planned 84 seconds, he worked 127 seconds.

    Am I missing something?