• chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They will try Luigi until it sticks. It’s critical to the powerful that they send the message they are beyond reproach.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Which is exactly why people like Luigi resort to the actions he took. It can never be undone no matter what they do to him afterwards.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I’m sad I won’t get picked for the jury. I’d refuse to convict on all counts. If Trump gets no punishment for literally anything this dude should get no punishment for fighting back against an absolutely broken system. Honestly, I don’t view his actions to be something to cause a public backlash. The prosecution is what will cause the public backlash, imo.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s not really how jury’s work though.

        You’re not there to dispense justice. You’re there to decide whether the defendant is guilty of the charges against him.

        Someone will be along in a moment to tell us all about Jury Nullification, a refusal to find the defendant guilty on the grounds that it would be unjust, despite the defendant’s obvious guilt.

        This pretty much reduces the court process to a popularity contest - how does the jury “feel” about the defendant, what are the “vibes” of the circumstances before them.

        Jurors determine guilt, and judges determine punishments. The separation of these concerns is the best way we have found to mitigate corruption since the advent of written laws. The outcome of a specific case may be unjust, but the system produces the fewest unjust outcomes.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Dude your last sentence was the cherry garnish in a big cup of government Kool aid.

          A just system wouldn’t have 98% of its convictions arriving out of plea deals.

          A just system wouldn’t jail a dude for stealing bread from a company that steals money from all of its employees. Employees that are already so underpaid, that they qualify for food stamps, that largely get spent at the same damn company.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            60 minutes ago

            I never said the system was just.

            Merely pointing out that separating the finding of guilt from the determination of punishment is the best way we have to mitigate corruption.

            I look forward to hearing your suggestions for a better system.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          60,000 Americans die every year because of the insurance industry, but how many oligarchs were brought to justice? How many oligarchs were arrested for raping children on Epstein’s island? How many oligarchs were arrested for funding Israel’s genocide of Gaza? How many oligarchs were arrested for the massive tax evasion revealed from the Panama papers???

          Justice that only punches down is not justice. If our system will not hold the wealthy accountable for their crimes against humanity then our system is utterly rotten

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            Everything you said is true, but it doesn’t really contradict my point.

            The current system is terrible, but it’s better than having a jury of laypeople make up the law based on the vibe of the case.

            I look forward to hearing your suggestions for a better judicial system.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Maybe they should fix the justice system if they want juries to actually act like they’re intended to.

          But they won’t, billionaires, CEOs, business execs, and other parasites will continue to do what they like and harm who they like with a slap on the wrist at most.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Who is “they” and how might they “fix” the justice system ?

            More than half of American voters just chose to subvert the already ineffective legal system, to install a corrupt felon as dictator.

            Are you proposing that allowing a jury of peers drawn from this public ought to be able to make up the law based on the vibe of cases before them ?

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      They will make it slow so they can twist the knife they shove into the publics stomach to keep everyone too scared to act. Government repression is the first cousin of terrorism, and Israel has innovated this year in making repression and racist terrorism cool again.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You think?

        I’d think they’d want to push him off the front page first. Then push him out a window later.