Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Anyone who thinks this shit is funny is in for a rude awakening.

    They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

    You don’t get out on technicalities in fascism; if the autocrat in charge wants to do the thing, he will do it. All of these things will be used as cudgels against perceived political enemies, and marginalized US citizens.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I want people to try to be less pesimistic, the point is that technicalities like this will waste time. Every one of these exectuive orders is going to be challanged in court, and while the GOP controls the higher courts, these cases will start in the lower ones. With any luck, the lower courts will stay the order until things can get resolved. Every appeal, every challange takes time to process and judges are under no obligation to resolve things quickly.

      The goal currently isnt to try and overturn the order, thats just pissing into the wind. The goal is to waste their time for 2 years and hope the house flips, if it does, we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

      • chad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The goal is to waste their time for 2 years and hope the house flips, if it does, we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

        And then we’ll have Couch Fucker McGoo as president.

        (not intending to kink shame)

        • caboose2006@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Nobody likes Vance. He’d be a completely ineffectual president. Which is preferable in my opinion.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’m, not sure about that. vance is probably a lot more likely to be worn as a sock puppet. drumpf will at least give them a hard time everytime he doesn’t want to do something.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Man, I’m tired of people calling realism “pessimism.” It’s kind of a huge problem actually when you think about it.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The Senate flipping is also a very real possibility in 2026. There are 22 Republican seats up for grabs and only 13 Democratic ones.

    • TheTux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      This. In much the same way an elder god doesn’t give a damn about conservation of energy or the square cubed law, a dictator with effectively un-checked power doesn’t care about wording of executive orders or LAWS. Be careful.
      Cthulu has woken from eons (4 years) of slumber (not being president) to ravage the planet, while looking like a moldy cheese puff.

      Edit: thankfully he’s not nearly as powerful as this metaphor implies, but the point stands. The law won’t stop him, I don’t trust the Dems to stop him, the only thing that will is worker’s might.

      • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        He doesn’t have fucking unchecked power, he has a slim majority in congress, a full diaper, and a constitutional deadline before he stops having any power. Don’t give him an inch, make them fight for every grain of sand.

        • keegomatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          With this Supreme Court and federal judge stack? Who decides constitutional issues? Who’s going to challenge the Supreme Court legally? The majority GOP senate? Or the majority GOP house of representatives? He has all three branches of government. Who can challenge all three legally? Anyone with a chance (vast wealth) were sitting behind him at the inauguration. In the sense of “checks and balances,” he literally has unchecked power.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

      The “de-fund the police” (but really adjust teaming to include psyche pros to ensure proper handling of at-risk people who do not warrant a response escalation) movement may show them how that’s done.