• Magnus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    In that instance there were only two guys with sticks, if I understood you correctly you want to add another stick to the mix.

    • robbinhood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There were three guys with sticks. China couldn’t project power far but Soviet-Sino relations were strained and the risk of war was high because they share borders.

      I’d love for there to be a world with no sticks period but humanity is a long way from that. Europe becoming the forth guy with a stick could force everyone else, and especially Russia, to be more cautious. And if it comes to blows, the EU/UK are gonna want to have that stick.

      If you’re EU/UK and multiple parties are around you with big sticks, would you rather be defenseless or have a stick?

          • Magnus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Every one entering into a new stick race won’t get us there any quicker sadly. Stick sellers on the other hand look forward to a bright and prosperous future.

            • robbinhood@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              True, sticks won’t bring about world peace on their own. Might save Europe from getting whacked for now.

              • Magnus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think more sticks in a time of climate collapse is a recipe for disaster. I’d prefer to see our governments commit to pumping co2 out of the atmosphere instead of enriching the local stick merchant.