• NameTaken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Here’s what you need to know- consortium news in 2016, the website was listed by PropOrNot as a “Russian propaganda outlet,” a claim Consortium News strongly disputes, arguing it challenges mainstream narratives and exposes bias in media.

    Article really is totally bias towards Russia and leaves out many well documented facts or any facts that would take away from the Russian narrative that Russian is the victim.

    Interesting to read for the sole fact it gives you insight into what the Russian propaganda machine is pumping out.

    • marathon@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Fact checking sites aren’t reliable. Consortium News is run and was founded by world-class investigative journalists who won Pulitzer’s. So I’ll take them over a “fact checking” site. You must think people are stupid.

      • NameTaken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m not sure how anyone would read that article knowing anything about Ukraine and not immediately realize this article is biased and misleading. It is certainly bending the truth. I think only a stupid person would try and defend it.

        P.S. I’ve personally been to Ukraine and also know people who are currently there. So I’ll take my first person account over you or you’re purposely misleading article.

        • marathon@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          P.S. I’ve personally been to Ukraine and also know people who are currently there. So I’ll take my first person account over you or you’re purposely misleading article.

          I bet you have! /s What part of Ukraine did you visit, East or West? And from which part of Ukraine did the person(s) you talked to come from? Context is everything. Also, you may want to brush up on some unchallengeable history—An actual timeline of events, if you wish to honestly enlighten yourself. https://consortiumnews.com/2025/02/25/ukraine-timeline-tells-the-tale

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Your anecdotal evidence doesn’t mean shit. Knowing people in Ukraine doesn’t refute the story.

          • NameTaken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The fact is that between February and March 2014, unmarked Russian soldiers occupied and blockaded the Simferopol International Airport, most of Ukraine’s Crimean military bases, and the Supreme Council of Crimea. The Kremlin stated that no Russian troops were active in the region, but many little green men were operating in this region while disguised as pro-Russian separatists.

            After two months of denial, on 17 April 2014, Russian president Vladimir Putin confirmed that the Russian military had been operating in Ukraine.

            So by Putin’s own account here, sending troops into Ukraine they of course started the war. All of which is conveniently left out of this article. Some great reporting here…