• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s literally the opposite. It’s very rare to work for a company that will consistently give you cost of living and performance increases that would outweigh a lateral move to another company. Someone who stays with the same company for more than five years is likely losing money to stay there.

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      “I know these assholes and what to expect from them. Moving to a new company means a whole new crop of assholes and unspoken rules that I have to learn to succeed. Pass.”

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not going somewhere else to get more money isn’t the same as losing money. That’s like saying I’m saving money by not buying $expensive_item when I wouldn’t buy that type of thing anyway.

      If I’m a painter, I’m not losing money by not being the CEO of RandomOtherCorp. Conflate ye not.

      • twopi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is though. That is the literal definition of opportunity cost.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you’re a first year painter working for a general contractor, you’re going to be paid less than a more experienced painter. After five years, you’ll be able to get more money from another general contractor applying as a painter with five years experience. You’re less likely to do that if you like working for your current general contractor.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    God I hate these guys who hop from one to the other job every few years. It’s always the guys who talk big, and when they can’t deliver (mostly because their “great” ideas will break something else) quickly leave “because this company is too much set in it’s ways”.

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol, I hate people licking corpo boots. No company deserves my loyalty. That’s been proven to me over and over again, they also definitely don’t deserve my best either. They can get what they always give, the bare minimum to stay an employee.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have 0 faith in these types of people. they stir up pot and leave in a few years. I let them do what they want and then change it back later. They achieve nothing because they refuse to listen and they just want to say the did x for the resume.

      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not the only way I’ve got a raise. I also got a raise once by saying I was planning on leaving. But I guess that’s pretty similar :)

        • I always think of the raise at the threat of leaving in the following way:

          • They could afford you at the higher price but tried to not pay you what you’re worth.
          • They now know that you’re willing to leave and are less reliable. This can lead them to use the increase to look for a replacement with the time the raise has bought them.

          Doing it collectively might be a bit of a different situation, though.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And who’s going to thank you for getting ground down to the bone doing a job you hate? Loyalty is a lie.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Says who I hate my job? I have switched jobs occasionally, but these guys will work somewhere for less than two years on average. I’m specifically referring to the seagull category of coworkers here, they come flying in with a lot of noise, shit all over the place and then leave with a lot of noise, leaving the shit to clean up for others.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          i remember being in an interview for a new marketing leador my dev team. the dude had 13 jobs over 10 years. to me that was the bigge;t of red flags. dude got hired in spite of my protest.

          i cannot think ok a worse employee i have ever worked with an i once had a boss embezzle $100k before skipping town.

  • Damage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Enough with the sympathy for the Microsoft layoffs! They worked at Microsoft!

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    How is your being at one organisation, then another, both for relatively short periods of time, relevant? How does that tell you that other people aren’t “loyal”? Why do you think loyalty even enters the equation?

    owned

    what? Did you mean “owed”? Which, still, fuck off, but that would make at least sense in context, I suppose?

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    One of the less lunatic posts here. Beyond what’s required by law and by contract, neither party owes the other shit… which is to say, from the perspective of living in a place that has the luxury of real worker protection laws and rights, Americans are kinda boned.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      neither party owes the other shit…

      FYI, this belief actively keeps folks (including me, previously) out of some really productive, effective and great communities.

      While it’s legally true, it’s not ethically acceptable in many important mutual aid agreements.

      I find that once I spend enough time in a community, I owe a lot of people for a lot of good they have done me.

      I didn’t previously have strong awareness of this, and my lack of awareness limited my career progress and community reputation.

      Edit: I find that someone posted it to LinkedIn is particularly funny, since LinkedIn is all about posturing for a mostly imaginary community.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, once upon a time there was an idea of sacrifice for the company and it waill sacrifice for you. That is gone, but not everyone knows this. Now no one should ever sacrfice or compromise for a company, thinking it will show thier loyalty and get paid back.