Some argue that bots should be entitled to ingest any content they see, because people can.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We were talking about consciousness not AI created works and copyright but I do have some opinions on that.

    I think that if an artist doesn’t want their works included in an AI dataset then it is their right to say no.

    And yeah all the extra data that we humans fundamentally aquire in life does change everything we make.

    • RickRussell_CA@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yeah all the extra data that we humans fundamentally aquire in life does change everything we make.

      I’d argue that it’s the crucial difference. People on this thread are arguing like humans never make original observations, or observe anything new, or draw new conclusions or interpretations of new phenomena, so everything humans make must be derived from past creations.

      Not only is that clearly wrong, but it also fails the test of infinite regress. If humans can only create from the work of other humans, how was anything ever created? It’s a risible suggestion.