• Kilgore Trout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What you get is what you get?
      Excuse me if this was the joke.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Somehow, despite being the standard it doesn’t come installed by default in any distro I’ve tried.

    They all insist you use sed… that bloated thing!

    • io@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      sed is a stream editor. A stream editor is used to perform basic text transformations on an input stream (a file or input from a pipeline). While in some ways similar to an editor which permits scripted edits (such as ed), sed works by making only one pass over the input(s), and is consequently more efficient. But it is sed’s ability to filter text in a pipeline which particularly distinguishes it from other types of editors.

      I love the way they are selling this

      https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      ed and sed arre different things. One edits files in place, interactively. The other edits streams i.e.batch processing.

      ed is the precursor to vi. Similar commands. It’s just you can only work on one line at a time.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        One edits files in place, interactively. The other edits streams i.e.batch processing.

        You want sed -i -f -

        ed is also the precursor of sed, and of some other dozen of commands.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yes ed begat sed, but sed works differently. It didn’t replace ed. It did a different job.

          Ed loads the file into a buffer which you edit in a random access fashion and then save. Sed collects a list of commands and then streams the file line by line, executing the commands as they match lines. In your example nothing happens until you’ve entered the whole editing script.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If your system has vi or a clone, try vi -e, or, if the symlink is set up, ex. Technically that’s vi in ex mode, not ed per-se but it’s about as similar as you’re going to get without a lot of pointless bother.

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Comparison time!

          ex is to ed as nano is to pico

          That is, it’s an editor that works in almost exactly the same way as the original, but it’s by somebody else.

          ex is to vi as vi is to vim, or C to C++.

          That is, the latter grew out of and improved upon the former, but you can still use them like their forerunners if you really want, which is why vi has an ex mode and why you can still use pointers in C++ if you’re sufficiently warped.

          • io@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            and how does qed, ed, ex and sed and grep relate to nano micro and pico in comparison? 🤔

            • palordrolap@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              qed was also a line editor but pre-dated and inspired ed, so that’s pico to nano or ed to ex again, just even further back in time.

              sed and grep grew out of commands within ed (or equivalent) so I guess you could say they’re each kind of a knight’s move two to the side and once backward from the direction of ex to vi. Backwards because they’re simpler, but two to the side because they’re not interactive.

              As to what would be “backward but one to the side” in that analogy, that’d be something like a tool that asked questions about every line in a file and made changes accordingly. I don’t think there’s any such standard tool, but I can think of at least a couple of ways to write one.

  • sga@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    i concede, you are too chad for me to even be in same plane of existence.