- cross-posted to:
- privacy@community.nicfab.it
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@community.nicfab.it
Not sure why Signal gets all the attention when Matrix is much more successful at spreading open source messaging and is also decentralized.
Not sure why Signal gets all the attention when Matrix is much more successful at spreading open source messaging and is also decentralized.
We actually don’t know what WhatsApp is doing. It’s a closed source app, so there is nothing preventing Facebook from getting your keys and reading your chats. It just takes one national security letter to force them.
Telegram wins because it’s usable by non-techies. And has open source clients. And has a decent Linux client. It’s preferable to chatting over Instagram.
@thervingi
I would still much rather chat to people over whatsapp than telegram because at least whatsapp has E2EE by default.
@sexy_peach
Why do you think WhatsApp has E2EE? It’s a closed source app. There is nothing preventing Facebook from grabbing your keys.
@thervingi
Probably the fact that if news slipped out, it would have been (one of) the biggest scandles facebook has ever done, and I dont personally think its worth the risk for them.
That’s what NDA’s are for :) Facebook got away with a lot worse.
Also it might not be Facebook’s decision. It takes one national security letter from the FISA court to force them.
on Telegram they wouldn’t even have to grab your keys, they can just run data collection on all their users unnoticed, without breaking any promises.
I don’t get this Telegram hate. Why prefer Facebook over something that supports Linux and has open source clients.
Because it isn’t encrypted.
Neither is WhatsApp.
No it is, but it sucks too.
Facebook says WhatsApp is end to end encrypted, but give me one reason to believe anything Facebook says. Unless you show me code, I can assume it’s not.