• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.

  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Honestly, as much as this surprises me, but from those 4 options, my kids would probably be safest with hitler. I assume the first woman is the one that just killed her 3 kids, so that’s a fundamental NOPE, diddy, yeah nah, that guy is just weird. So it boils down to the islamic terrorist and the cocaine-addicted, so I’d just give it hitler and hope he has a good day without thaaaaat much cocaine.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bin Laden could be trusted because from what I know he never purposely wanted kids targeted. One murdered several children, one murdered too many to count in concentration camps as well as ordering soldiers to do it because he didn’t see them as human. The last one was a sex pest and I wouldn’t trust kids with.

    • dan69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The man had multiple wives and multiple kids. All of which where taken care of financially- so ya seconded

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Western educated man who is pissed off at the US for abandoning his political ascension? Slightly better than a meth addicted turboracist, a crazy murderer, and a child molester. I doubt bin Laden is going to be able to do much opinion changing in a single evening and I doubt that he’d outright kill or molest them.

      • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Bin Laden fathered 24 children, the first of which was with his first cousin when she was 16 and he was 17. They went on to have ten more children. The other 13 were spread amongst five other wives. They also found several beheading videos on his computer. He also believed muslims should kill any US civilians they find until the US withdraws support for Israel.

        I think definitely killing and maybe molestation would be on the table.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not even remotely close. I saw him first and before seeing the rest of the faces I already knew that this was an usian thing so he was going to be “a major evil”.

      Fact is, aside religion, we’d have a lot in common, including hating the US so, if any, it would give for an interesting evening for my kids and a more interesting post-evening chat with him.

      The other 3, in my eyes, are way, waaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse.

    • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You must not know very much about Bin Laden. Give his Wikipedia articles a quick skim. Your kids wouldn’t survive the night. If they survive an hour, it’s because they decided to kill them slowly.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Top left is the perpertrator of (trigger warning, 3 kids killed, I’m leaving the link as it is instead of adding text to it so you know what it is without having to click on it) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_the_Clancy_children

      Bottom right is P Diddy aka Puff Daddy aka Sean Combs. Known for, among other things: helping more talented musicians than himself make good music, dating J-Lo, playing in a Muppets movie, rape parties, domestic violence, guest appearance on Notorious B.I.G’s track Mo Money Mo Problems, potentially ordering the hit on 2pac’s life, being a general piece of shit with tons of connections and money. He was like the Hip-Hop world’s Epstein, though I don’t remember if the “performers” at the Diddy Parties were children or adult women, they were definitely getting raped though.

      Like those two Americans are so bad that between these 4 people… I’d be most likely to trust bin Laden. In this very hypothetical scenario, because this is a shitpost and in reality if I can’t find a sitter and I get to choose between these 4, well guess what, I’m just cancelling my plans and staying home. Might be a tie between bin Laden and Hitler actually, we’re not Jewish, Roma or any other minority he tried exterminating.

  • 3daybanwithdrawl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Did Hitler actually do any killing people himself, or did he just have other people do it for him? If it’s the latter then I pick him, because I think he’s too lazy to actually do anything.

  • ☭SaltyIcetea☭ @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    ngl, since im a white, cis, heterosexual, non-jewish, german: probably hitler. i dont think he was the kinda guy that would kill children just because he could. if these children happened to have like, a jewish mother, things would definitely look different

    • Damage
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m italian so I guess it depends on when on the timeline they plucked him

    • TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Woman who recently had a mistrial go viral for being the latest influencer courtroom case. Similar to Depp v Heard. The woman’s name is Lindsay Clancy, I believe.

      Notable things (viewing this through the lens of my wife who told me about this case):

      • flimsy hard evidence against the mother
      • mother allegedly tried to kill herself 3 different ways after snapping and allegedly killing her children while the husband was out of the house
      • a lot of the evidence seemed to be hearsay from the husband
      • children’s bodies were cremated by the father
      • father is suspected of having a mistress because he moved on after this relatively quickly.
      • jury trial ended in a hung jury, because 1 juror tried to reverse “12 Angry Men” it to get all other jurors to switch to a Guilty verdict.
      • Clancy admitted to the murders initially

      My unsolicited opinion is that she very likely did commit the crimes, but the State has insufficient evidence to convict due to the police’s negligence during their investigation.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          also this guy is spreading lies. the evidence is clear she did it, and she confessed. there was no despute as to her guilt in murdering her children.

          the issue is whether she can be held criminally liable for first degree murder. if the charges had been manslaughter or something else, it would have been a slam dunk conviction. but due to her mental state at the time, it’s questionable if she was capable/committed first degree, or premeditated, murder.

          but people don’t want to talk about the legal issues in the case… they just want to push the emotional bullshit that she was absolutely innocent, or absolutely guilty, and there can’t be anything in-between. and lots and lots of people like the db0 user commenting here are spreading lies about the case to push their political agenda.

          to the point that many of the TikTok moms who support her innocence are working entirely outside of the factual evidence of the case. which is also more evidence of how social media itself is causing psychosis in many folks, as it’s well-documented already how social media amplifies delusional and paranoid thinking.

          • TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I was pretty explicit, I think she did it and the state lacks evidence to convict beyond the shadow of doubt.

            Sorry if the db0 in my username added some political leaning to my above post. I was trying to be pretty by the numbers as best as I knew.

            I didn’t even mention the fact that there’s been a giant push for people to claim that the father committed the murders. It’s pretty far out there for claims.

            I know another comment some issues with the way her specific state handles insanity pleas. Of that, I am not too in the know about. So I didn’t mention it.