• Cowbee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s either the terminally online, or the people that have managed to actually make it far enough that it even matters. In the west, it absolutely doesn’t matter, except perhaps in revolutionary strategy, ie Anarcho-Syndicalism vs Vanguardism vs etc.

    Day to day, the same exact praxis persists: educate yourself, improve your life and understanding, advocate for positive change, unionize, build up your community, and educate others. It doesn’t matter what leftist tendency you personally prefer, the praxis on a day to day level is the same.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Revolutionarily, I agree. Especially in such a non-unionized country like the US, Syndicalism seems more apt than hoping for a Vanguard Party.

        • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ???

          Vanguard parties will always emerge as some proles will be radicalized sooner than others, the difference in union strategy is that syndies want less centralization between the radical unions and dont percieve themselves as the vanguard.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depends on what you consider to be a Vanguard, whether you mean an actual, defined party or simply more educated, radicalized proles leading others.