• novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Ah… so I have to save 65% of my take home pay…

      That’s literally impossible though lmao. 35% of my income is rent. And I already pay way below market rate in my region.

      I have to more than double my income suddenly, and pray nothing becomes more expensive.

      Basically what you did was something only a very small handful of people can do. It requires a decent amount of luck tbh.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah, my HR representative said I should be saving 15% of my income for retirement. I can’t even afford to save that much. By the time you deduct my mortgage, health care costs, food, and other necessities, I have very little left over.

        Maybe I could save 15% of my salary if I lived my life without anything enjoyable. No smartphone, no streaming service (even though I’m only paying for one and don’t have cable TV), nothing purchased at all to enjoy life. Just live a Spartan, barebones life. Maybe then, I could scrounge together 15% to save for retirement, but my life up to retirement would be extremely miserable.

        I feel like this advice was concocted by people making much more than I make. “So, when you get your $10,000 biweekly paycheck, put 15% of it away. See? So easy!”

          • TechyDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            And even if you can afford to enjoy tomorrow, there’s no guarantee that your body will let you. My parents were frugal as I was growing up - taking very few vacations. For various reasons, my father retired with very little money.

            Even if he had money, though, my father’s health has deteriorated. He lives about 3.5 hours drive from me and can’t make that journey. For him, even an hours’ drive is a lot and airplane trips are out of the question. Even if he had a decent retirement savings, he wouldn’t be able to truly enjoy it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        You know I’m not the same person you asked, right? Given how few people use Lemmy, if there are two of us FIRE (Financially Independent, Retire Early) folks in this thread, maybe it’s more common and more feasible than you realize.

        Edit (with 4 downvotes so far): wow, even the gentlest suggestion that there’s a viable alternative to wage-slavery really generates the hate, huh? I sure would like to know what you folks’ objections are.

        • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          What’s with the hate guys? I’m only living your impossible dream and telling you that if you weren’t an idiot you’d be retired at 35 too!

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            Who said anything about impossible? All it takes is lowering your expectations on how much stuff you can buy.

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Bro I don’t buy anything. Most people don’t buy anything. They live paycheck to paycheck just covering the basics. The little I spend on not being miserable wouldn’t be even 1% enough to save to retire at 35. The only way for me to cut costs is to start squatting? Steal food from the supermarket? Idk. In Minecraft ofc.

                • novibe@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Man if you think the US is the hardest place to live, you truly are drowning in privilege. No offence.

                  And I hope you do realise that the benefits and ease you have to live life are the direct fruits of the overexploitation of the global south by your government.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                They live paycheck to paycheck just covering the basics.

                Let me guess: “basics” include expenses to commute to work in a car, right?

                Well, for starters, don’t do that.

                • novibe@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Let me guess, you have no idea how most people in the world live. Most people in most places can’t afford a car at all, and spend a good chunk of their money on public transport anyways.

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    This article, this thread, and my comments have all been about the United States. That’s what we’re talking about: the United States. If you think it’s some sort of “gotcha” that what I wrote doesn’t apply to folks in Somalia or wherever, you’re just being disingenuous.